2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiple-input deep residual convolutional neural network for reservoir permeability prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, using GMDH to predict the formation permeability from well log data, trying to estimate the nuclear magnetic resonance-derived permeability from conventional well logs by hiring GMDH. Masroor et al showed a decrease in the computation time by 70% for permeability prediction from well log data when a combination of the modified Levenberg–Marquardt technique and GMDH was applied . Mahdaviara et al estimated the permeability of some heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs with respect to the porosity, irreducible water saturation, and pore-specific surface area by applying GMDH and GEP algorithms .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, using GMDH to predict the formation permeability from well log data, trying to estimate the nuclear magnetic resonance-derived permeability from conventional well logs by hiring GMDH. Masroor et al showed a decrease in the computation time by 70% for permeability prediction from well log data when a combination of the modified Levenberg–Marquardt technique and GMDH was applied . Mahdaviara et al estimated the permeability of some heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs with respect to the porosity, irreducible water saturation, and pore-specific surface area by applying GMDH and GEP algorithms .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning is effectively used by Man et al (2021) to boost the prediction of permeability and reduces uncertainty in reservoir modeling. Recently, a variety of conventional methods and machine learning algorithms were investigated in determining hydraulic flow units (HFUs), and the performance of each method was evaluated (Fernandes et al, 2023a;Kianoush et al, 2022bKianoush et al, , 2023cKianoush et al, 2023a;Masroor et al, 2023;mohammadinia et al, 2023;Shi et al, 2023;Yu et al, 2023). Salavati et al (2023) used hydraulic flow units, multi-resolution graphbased clustering, and fuzzy c-mean clustering methods to determine rock types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compilation of core porosity and permeability are used to identify these units. Yasmaniar et al (2018) utilized Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to determine the permeability of different Rock Type Using the Hydraulic Flow Unit Concept (Ding et al, 2022;Kharrat et al, 2009;Kianoush et al, 2023c;Mahadasu and Singh, 2022;Masroor et al, 2023;Rafik and Kamel, 2017). Oliveira et al (2020) demonstrated that an inter-clustering process is recommended when selecting data points associated with representative volumes and local spots characterizing HFUs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning is effectively used by Man et al (2021) to boost the prediction of permeability and reduces uncertainty in reservoir modeling. Recently, a variety of conventional methods and machine learning algorithms were investigated in determining hydraulic flow units (HFUs), and the performance of each method was evaluated (Fernandes et al, 2023a;Forbes Inskip et al, 2020;Kianoush et al, 2022bKianoush et al, , 2023cKianoush et al, 2023a;Masroor et al, 2023;mohammadinia et al, 2023;Shi et al, 2023;Yu et al, 2023). Salavati et al (2023) used hydraulic flow units, multi-resolution graph-based clustering, and fuzzy c-mean clustering methods to determine rock types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%