2016
DOI: 10.1180/minmag.2016.080.046a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiple regression method for estimating Li in tourmaline from electron microprobe analyses

Abstract: Lithium cannot be determined by electron microprobe, but it may be an essential component in tourmalinesupergroup minerals. Therefore, its estimation is important for structural formula calculation and nomenclature. In this paper, we present a method to estimate Li content in tourmaline from microprobe data based on a multiple linear-regression model, which is not reliant on a particular normalization scheme. The results derived from this model are reasonably accurate, particularly for low-Mg tourmalines (<… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For analyses showing OH + F > 4 apfu due to excesses of microprobe determined SiO 2 (quartz nanoinclusions), the amount of the component was reduced to a value for which the stoichiometric OH + F = 4 apfu was achieved, i.e., the highest content accepted for the tourmaline structure. The estimation of the Li 2 O amounts from EMPA on the basis of a multiple regression equation given by Pesquera et al [33] is not applicable in our case, because the calculated Li 2 O amount seems to be ZnO dependent for high ZnO contents (Figure 3). Comparing the contents of Li 2 O obtained from our calculation procedure and the amounts from the regression equation by Pesquera et al [33], all data points corresponding to Zn-rich tourmaline deviate distinctly from the 1:1 trend and, in our opinion it is due to high contents of ZnO, a component which was not included as an important independent variable in the multiple regression by Pesquera et al [33].…”
Section: Electron Microprobe Analysis (Empa)mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For analyses showing OH + F > 4 apfu due to excesses of microprobe determined SiO 2 (quartz nanoinclusions), the amount of the component was reduced to a value for which the stoichiometric OH + F = 4 apfu was achieved, i.e., the highest content accepted for the tourmaline structure. The estimation of the Li 2 O amounts from EMPA on the basis of a multiple regression equation given by Pesquera et al [33] is not applicable in our case, because the calculated Li 2 O amount seems to be ZnO dependent for high ZnO contents (Figure 3). Comparing the contents of Li 2 O obtained from our calculation procedure and the amounts from the regression equation by Pesquera et al [33], all data points corresponding to Zn-rich tourmaline deviate distinctly from the 1:1 trend and, in our opinion it is due to high contents of ZnO, a component which was not included as an important independent variable in the multiple regression by Pesquera et al [33].…”
Section: Electron Microprobe Analysis (Empa)mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Comparing the contents of Li 2 O obtained from our calculation procedure and the amounts from the regression equation by Pesquera et al [33], all data points corresponding to Zn-rich tourmaline deviate distinctly from the 1:1 trend and, in our opinion it is due to high contents of ZnO, a component which was not included as an important independent variable in the multiple regression by Pesquera et al [33]. [33]. Symbols: dark squares-analyses with ZnO < 1.20 wt %, grey diamonds-analyses with ZnO > 3.50 wt %.…”
Section: Electron Microprobe Analysis (Empa)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The raw data were reduced with the PAP routine of Pouchou and Pichoir (1991). The estimation of the Li 2 O amounts from EPMA results on the basis of a multipleregression equation of Pesquera et al (2016) did not give positive result because the calculated Li 2 O amount (in wt%) is distinctly ZnO dependent for higher ZnO contents (Pieczka et al 2018).…”
Section: Electron Probe Microanalysis (Epma)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pesquera et al (2016) derived a statistical equation allowing the calculation of Li 2 O content in wt% from the amounts of main oxide components of Li-bearing tourmalines such as SiO 2 , Al O 3 , total Fe as FeO and MnO. However, as shown by Pieczka et al (2018), this method does not work well, if a tourmaline is enriched by an atypical component, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a). Chemical analyses demonstrate that the host is a X ☐-W O-W F-rich elbaite with the average composition: (Na 0.54 ☐ 0.41 Ca 0.05 ) (Al 1.79 Li 1.08 Mn 0.12 Fe 0.01 ) Al 6.0 (Si 5.91 Al 0.09 ) (BO 3 ) 3 O 18 (OH 3 ) (F 0.37 OH 0.37 O 0.27 ), based on normalization to 15 Y+Z+T with Li estimated by the Pesquera et al (2016) approach, calculated B (to 3.0 apfu) and calculated OH (based on charge balance). Individual fibers display three distinct tourmaline generations showing effects of partial dissolution and reprecipitation, with each generation having distinct compositions (Fig.…”
Section: Tourmaline Recording the Transition From Magmatic-to--hydrotmentioning
confidence: 99%