2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-013-9574-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiple-scale analysis of host plant selection in Lepidoptera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The larvae of E. tages were associated with south-facing slopes, whereas their foodplant (L. corniculatus) was associated with west-facing slopes. This re ects other studies that have found associations of E. tages with south-facing slopes in the UK (Dickins et al 2013). Our result implies that this is a true re ection of E. tages preference, rather than of their foodplant's habitat association.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The larvae of E. tages were associated with south-facing slopes, whereas their foodplant (L. corniculatus) was associated with west-facing slopes. This re ects other studies that have found associations of E. tages with south-facing slopes in the UK (Dickins et al 2013). Our result implies that this is a true re ection of E. tages preference, rather than of their foodplant's habitat association.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Oviposition‐site selection is a hierarchical process that operates at several spatial scales, each of which provides different cues that the females may respond to (Vinson, ; Visser, ; Dickins et al., ; Martínez et al., ). In our study, host‐plant preferences for oviposition and feeding by T. peregrinus females were not tightly correlated, suggesting that different criteria mediate each of these selection steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured the aggregation or lumping of patches using AI and patch complexity with MSI. We compared landscape metrics between years using a Kruskal-Wallis one-way variance analysis with a significance level of 0.05 due to unequal variances and non-normal distributions (Dickins et al 2013).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%