2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2007.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiple stakeholders’ approach to strategic selection decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process is triggered by demand for action and it ends with a specific engagement execution [1]. Corporations have to choose the best option by aggregating outcomes of different stakeholders [2]. Although the decision-making problem could be constructed as more than one hierarchy with different criteria [3] to be solved, this process is still hard due to the following:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is triggered by demand for action and it ends with a specific engagement execution [1]. Corporations have to choose the best option by aggregating outcomes of different stakeholders [2]. Although the decision-making problem could be constructed as more than one hierarchy with different criteria [3] to be solved, this process is still hard due to the following:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct result of the method is to increase understanding and reduce uncertainty of CC impact on industry at regional level. Although there is much research explaining stakeholder selection procedures and the importance of participation in the environmental decision-making and evaluation process (Ali Khatami Firouzadbadi et al, 2007;Eefje et al, 2008;Human and Davies, 2010;Voinov and Bousquet, 2010), the authors have taken different dimensions into account so the selection criteria for stakeholders has been to choose people representing a given category who play an important role. The types were managers, scientists and official government technicians.…”
Section: Usefulness Of the Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other extended AHP, such as fuzzy AHP, group AHP, and fuzzy and TOPSIS, were developed to solve inherent fuzziness of preference. These methods were applied to weight important performance index or indicators for general public transportation, ITS and smart mobility theme [49,51,[64][65][66][67] as well as to assess performance for supporting decision making and deciding best alternatives [10,12,32,36,43,44,46,[68][69][70][71]. The difficulty of intelligent transportation system performance measurement is to assess the different objectives of the development, which can mitigate the complexity of impact assessment by weighting each criterion with a priority value [15].…”
Section: Ahp and Fuzzy Ahp Of Transportation Its And Public Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%