1984
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(84)90042-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiple time-step method for molecular dynamics simulations of fluids of chain molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the system to be studied has to handle particles with high velocities, algorithms with multiple time steps could be used (Tuckerman et al 1990;Swindoll & Haile 1984;Teleman & Jonsson 1986). Still, if even with these methods the simulation is not practical or does not portray the system accurately, it might be recommended to use an HSDEM program instead of an SSDEM.…”
Section: Particle-particle Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the system to be studied has to handle particles with high velocities, algorithms with multiple time steps could be used (Tuckerman et al 1990;Swindoll & Haile 1984;Teleman & Jonsson 1986). Still, if even with these methods the simulation is not practical or does not portray the system accurately, it might be recommended to use an HSDEM program instead of an SSDEM.…”
Section: Particle-particle Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is then used to improve upon the quasi-separate propagation, without incurring significant additional computational cost. The method of Swindoll and Haile [22] is also more accurate than that of Teleman and Jonsson [21], but it needs higher-order spatial derivatives of the potential. This has to be avoided here, since most of the time is already spent calculating first derivatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…51,[72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] The various available MTS schemes differ in the way they approximate the slowly varying force contribution at each microintegration time step. 79 Common approximations are: (1) to omit it and reintroduce its effect as a trajectory correction at each macrointegration time step (NAPA 67 and RESPA 68, 69 schemes); (2) to include it as a time-independent contribution [80][81][82] and, possibly, reintroduce the effect of its time dependence as a trajectory correction at each macrointegration time step; 69,70 (3) to extrapolate its time dependence based on a Taylor-series expansion 83,84 or some other extrapolation method; [85][86][87] (4) to approximate its time dependence so as to enforce equivalence with the standard Verlet integrator (so-called Verlet equivalence) when all forces are treated as slowly varying forces (Verlet-II 73 and Verlet-X 88 schemes); (5) to omit it and reintroduce it as a force contribution acting only at the beginning and at the end of each macrointegration time step (impulse schemes, such as the Verlet-I scheme 73 and the equivalent but more general r-RESPA scheme, 51,[74][75][76]89 or the mollified-impulse MOLLY scheme [90][91][92] ). The latter impulse-based MTS schemes are attractive because the corresponding integrators are both time-reversible and symplectic (and generally second-order accurate), which is generally not the case for the other MTS methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%