2003
DOI: 10.1142/s0219199703000938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiplicity Result for Elliptic Equations at Critical Growth in Low Dimension

Abstract: We consider the problem -Δu = |u|2*-2u + λu in Ω, u = 0 on ∂Ω, where Ω is an open regular subset of ℝN (N ≥ 3), [Formula: see text] is the critical Sobolev exponent and λ is a constant in ]0, λ1[ where λ1 is the first eigenvalue of -Δ. In this paper we show that, when N ≥ 4, the problem has at least [Formula: see text] (pairs of) solutions, improving a result obtained in [4] for N ≥ 6.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of infinitely many solutions to (BN )ǫ for any ǫ > 0 was established by Devillanova-Solimini in [22] when n ≥ 7. Moreover, for low dimensions n = 4, 5, 6, in [23] they proved the existence of at least n + 1 pairs of solutions provided ǫ is small enough. Ben Ayed-El Mehdi-Pacella in [7,8] studied the blow up of the low energy sign-changing solutions of problems (AC)ǫ and (BN )ǫ as ǫ goes to zero and they classified these solutions according to the concentration speeds of the positive and negative part.…”
Section: Uǫ(x)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The existence of infinitely many solutions to (BN )ǫ for any ǫ > 0 was established by Devillanova-Solimini in [22] when n ≥ 7. Moreover, for low dimensions n = 4, 5, 6, in [23] they proved the existence of at least n + 1 pairs of solutions provided ǫ is small enough. Ben Ayed-El Mehdi-Pacella in [7,8] studied the blow up of the low energy sign-changing solutions of problems (AC)ǫ and (BN )ǫ as ǫ goes to zero and they classified these solutions according to the concentration speeds of the positive and negative part.…”
Section: Uǫ(x)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This bound has been used in some papers to obtain existence and multiplicity results for solutions of (1.3), see e.g. [16,17,24]. The proof of Lemma 1.1 is easy, and it is given for instance in [39, p.185].…”
Section: Lemma 11 (Energy Doubling Of Sign Changing Solutions) Everymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For λ > 0, the existence of nontrivial solutions of (1.3) was proved in several cases in a celebrated paper of Brezis and Nirenberg [12]. Further existence and multiplicity results were derived in [13][14][15]45], whereas the most recent results can be found in [16,23,24]. For λ = 0, Pohožaev's identity (see [34] or [39, p. 171]) implies that (1.3) has no nontrivial solutions on strictly starshaped domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gap is common in the literature (see e.g. [5,6,12,21,23] and [8,Chapter 8]). Basically, it consists in assuming that the natural constraint…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%