2022
DOI: 10.1107/s1600576722003089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multipurpose laboratory diffractometer for operando powder X-ray diffraction investigations of energy materials

Abstract: Laboratory X-ray diffractometers are among the most widespread instruments in research laboratories around the world and are commercially available in different configurations and setups from various manufacturers. Advances in detector technology and X-ray sources push the data quality of in-house diffractometers and enable the collection of time-resolved scattering data during operando experiments. Here, the design and installation of a custom-built multipurpose laboratory diffractometer for the crystallograp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasonable assumption of Vegard behavior allows for a rough estimation of the Ni content of the spinel phase based on the variation of the lattice parameters. As discussed before, [ 27 ] PXRD data from different studies is difficult to compare. Relative differences of LNMO materials published within individual studies, in contrast, are quite reliable, as it can be assumed that uniform measurement conditions and evaluation techniques were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasonable assumption of Vegard behavior allows for a rough estimation of the Ni content of the spinel phase based on the variation of the lattice parameters. As discussed before, [ 27 ] PXRD data from different studies is difficult to compare. Relative differences of LNMO materials published within individual studies, in contrast, are quite reliable, as it can be assumed that uniform measurement conditions and evaluation techniques were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystal structures of the LNMO and the secondary phases were investigated by means of powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD). The room temperature measurements were carried out on an advanced laboratory diffractometer (Typ 5021, Huber) equipped with a microfocus rotating anode X‐ray generator (Rigaku MM007, Mo‐ K a radiation, parallel collimated beam, Ø ≈ 2 mm) and a 2D Pilatus 300K‐W detector, with a sample to detector distance of 0.7 m. [ 27 ] Measurements were carried out in an angular range of 7° < 2θ < 47°. In order to reliably track small changes in the lattice parameter, all samples, together with a standard reference material (LaB 6 NIST SRM 660c) were packed separated from each other, into a single glass capillary with a diameter of 0.5 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exchange reaction was studied by in situ XRD using a custom-built diffractometer, the specifics of which were reported previously . For sample preparation, a 1:1 wt mixture of NNO-600 and LiNO 3 was ground in a mortar and filled into a sapphire capillary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exchange reaction was studied by in situ XRD using a custom-built diffractometer, the specifics of which were reported previously. 57 For sample preparation, a 1:1 wt mixture of NNO-600 and LiNO 3 was ground in a mortar and filled into a sapphire capillary. The mixture was then heated at a rate of 1 K min −1 under an O 2 atmosphere, with each XRD pattern being the accumulated signal over 5 min.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, for studying solid-state synthesis reactions in particular there are several advantages: not only is the larger amount of sample more comparable to real synthesis conditions in the laboratory but also the loss of Li precursors through reaction with the quartz capillary can be reduced. This loss of precursors has been observed in previous studies and presents a significant issue, due to the small amount of sample and large contact surface with the tube (Geßwein et al, 2022;Bianchini, Fauth et al, 2020). Li 4 SiO 4 impurities were observed, undermining the targeted stoichiometry of the final LiNiO 2 product.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%