2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icecs.2011.6122222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multisensor data fusion approach for improving the classification accuracy of uterine EMG signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that it is easier to distinguish between pregnancies recorded at different stages of gestation than it is to distinguish between the time of delivery. Support Vector Machines (SVM) have also been successfully used to classify term and preterm deliveries [16]. This classifier classifies contractions as either labour or nonlabour, using different locations on the abdomen.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that it is easier to distinguish between pregnancies recorded at different stages of gestation than it is to distinguish between the time of delivery. Support Vector Machines (SVM) have also been successfully used to classify term and preterm deliveries [16]. This classifier classifies contractions as either labour or nonlabour, using different locations on the abdomen.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The support vector machine shows some promising results. For example, in [17], for a single SVM classifier, at one particular location on the abdomen, the result shows a 78.4% accuracy -the overall classification accuracy, for the combined SVM, was 88.4%. Finding the coefficients, for the decision boundary, occurs by solving a quadratic optimization problem.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important also to note that, due to the complexity of the analyzed data, a SVM classifier with a RBF kernel which is known to be a strong classifier should be used as the component classifier of the network. When tested on the same data, SVM classifier with a RBF kernel yielded better classification results than a neural network of the same kernel function [18,41]. On the other hand, the use of the multiresolution analysis and the LDB algorithm that selects a basis from a dictionary that illuminates the dissimilarities among the two classes presented an important preprocessing step for increasing the discriminatory powers of the extracted features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, when a decision fusion rule was applied, an improved accuracy of the classification decision compared to a decision based on any of the individual data sources alone was obtained. Furthermore, based on the fact that there was variability between the classification accuracies of the different channels, a decision fusion rule based on the WMV may be more convenient for combining the decisions than other rules such as the majority voting as concluded in [41]. It is important also to note that, due to the complexity of the analyzed data, a SVM classifier with a RBF kernel which is known to be a strong classifier should be used as the component classifier of the network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation