2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2010.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multisite, Multi–Academic Track Evaluation of End-of-Life Simulation for Nursing Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation is presented by several authors as a useful strategy in preparing students for end of life scenarios [17,18,22,24,[26][27][28][29][30], particularly as opportunities to care for these people while learning may be limited. Simulation was found to be effective in increasing knowledge, self-confidence [26,28,29], self-reported communication skills and student satisfaction [26]. Students found real time patient status changes in simulation to be valuable in addition to providing a safe learning environment for improving technical skills [27,28].…”
Section: Education Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation is presented by several authors as a useful strategy in preparing students for end of life scenarios [17,18,22,24,[26][27][28][29][30], particularly as opportunities to care for these people while learning may be limited. Simulation was found to be effective in increasing knowledge, self-confidence [26,28,29], self-reported communication skills and student satisfaction [26]. Students found real time patient status changes in simulation to be valuable in addition to providing a safe learning environment for improving technical skills [27,28].…”
Section: Education Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of papers mention some other learning activities delivered either prior or alongside the simulation. However, it is not clear how the effect of simulation is being measured controlling for the effects of other learning opportunities, even in those studies that measure understanding (Fluharty et al, 2012;Moreland et al, 2012;Twigg & Lynn, 2012). Nor is there evidence of an underpinning pedagogy of simulated learning that might support Parker and Myrick's (2009) critique that simulation has developed with technical advances without full consideration of how people use such technologies to learn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In considering the utility and validity of the Gabby et al (2014) pyramid approach, six of the studies do not include all three elements, although some of these studies have a limited report of the evaluation of the simulation learning (Fluharty et al, 2012;Gilliland et al, 2012;Leighton & Dubas, 2009;Pullen et al, 2012;Swenty & Eggleston, 2011;Tuxbury et al, 2012). The remaining 11 studies include elements of all three skills factors (technical, soft, and learning), which may support the view that Gabby et al's (2014) concept is a good fit as a frame for analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, end-of-life care simulation research that has examined nursing student stress is scant [9,[11][12][13]. Analyzing the relationship between nursing student stress, simulators, and their working backgrounds is lacking in the literature.…”
Section: Simulation As a Driving Force For End-of-life Care Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%