2013
DOI: 10.2478/amcs-2013-0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multivariable multiobjective predictive controller

Abstract: Predictive control of MIMO processes is a challenging problem which requires the specification of a large number of tuning parameters (the prediction horizon, the control horizon and the cost weighting factor). In this context, the present paper compares two strategies to design a supervisor of the Multivariable Generalized Predictive Controller (MGPC), based on multiobjective optimization. Thus, the purpose of this work is the automatic adjustment of the MGPC synthesis by simultaneously minimizing a set of cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking inspiration from Aicha et al [33], Junior et al [34], and Storn and Price [35], an adaptive DE algorithm is utilized for Jfalse¯i()k. The details on adaptive DE algorithm can be found in our previous work [38].…”
Section: Baseline Mpc Design Under Fault‐free Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking inspiration from Aicha et al [33], Junior et al [34], and Storn and Price [35], an adaptive DE algorithm is utilized for Jfalse¯i()k. The details on adaptive DE algorithm can be found in our previous work [38].…”
Section: Baseline Mpc Design Under Fault‐free Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, postulate 2 contradicts it because fuel consumption minimization means that most effective compressors should be fully loaded all the time. Problems of similar nature have been studied recently in [12]: the authors consider there a multicritreria model predictive control, comparing two methods of picking up a unique solution out of the Pareto front.…”
Section: A Multiple Optimality Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, MOEAs can be categorized into three groups, namely, dominance-based methods, scalarization-based methods, and performance indicator-based approaches (Cheng et al, 2015;Denysiuk et al, 2015). Among these, dominance-based approaches such as SPEA2 (Zitzler et al, 2001), NSGA-II (Deb et al, 2002;Ben Aicha et al, 2013), NSGA-III (Deb and Jain, 2014), and NSLS (Chen et al, 2015) have been probably the most commonly used approaches, which calculate an individual's fitness on the basis of the Pareto dominance relation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%