1972
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330370108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multivariate dental sexing technique

Abstract: This paper presents a method of sexing skeletal remains using dental measurements. A base sample from a population is sexed with reference to the postcranial skeleton and the dental measurements (buccal-lingual and mesial-distal diameters) are analyzed by the discriminant function technique. A linear function is derived, which will classify by sex the remaining portion of the population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
58
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the sample size was considerably reduced. No other dental measurements were used because successful sex allocation was proven to be less reliable than the results based on canine measurements (Ditch and Rose, 1972;Işcan and Kedici, 2003;Cardoso, 2008). Furthermore, in the Bom Santo series, canines were numerically one of the better represented teeth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus the sample size was considerably reduced. No other dental measurements were used because successful sex allocation was proven to be less reliable than the results based on canine measurements (Ditch and Rose, 1972;Işcan and Kedici, 2003;Cardoso, 2008). Furthermore, in the Bom Santo series, canines were numerically one of the better represented teeth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His results indicate that the bucco-lingual diameter (BLD) of the permanent canine provides the best sex allocation (100% for the upper canine and 86% for the lower canine). Others also found a very significant sexual dimorphism in the BLD of canines in samples of individuals of known-sex (Yamada and Sakai 1992;Işcan and Kedici, 2003;Cardoso 2008;Rai et al 2008;Ruengdit et al 2011;Zorba et al 2011) and on an archaeological sample of individuals whose sex could be ascertained from their pelves and long bones (Ditch and Rose, 1972). In contrast, Vodanovic et al (2007) failed to do this in a sample of medieval Croatians of unknown sex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The purpose of this procedure is, first, to estimate precisely the age of the skeletons, because the timing of tooth formation (the benchmark for aging) is affected by sex (Smith, 1991); and second, to elucidate any sex differences in growth pattern. Although inferring the sex of an immature skeleton before the onset of puberty is generally difficult, discriminant function analysis based on dimorphism of permanent tooth size is known to be effective (Ditch and Rose, 1972;Garn et al, 1979;Hanihara and Koizumi, 1979;Beyer-Olsen and Alexandersen, 1995;Matsumura, 1998). The results of sexing modern specimens of known sex by this method have also shown its efficacy.…”
Section: Sexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of sexual dimorphism was calculated following Garn et al, method [12]. Positive values were obtained for mesiodistal dimensions of all primary teeth [ …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%