2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca1b7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiwavelength View of the Rapidly Evolving SN 2018ivc: An Analog of SN IIb 1993J but Powered Primarily by Circumstellar Interaction

Abstract: SN 2018ivc is an unusual Type II supernova (SN II). It is a variant of SNe IIL, which might represent a transitional case between SNe IIP with a massive H-rich envelope and SNe IIb with only a small amount of the H-rich envelope. However, SN 2018ivc shows an optical light-curve evolution more complicated than that of canonical SNe IIL. In this paper, we present the results of prompt follow-up observations of SN 2018ivc with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array. Its synchrotron emission is similar t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a scenario may also be in line with its optical spectral features showing broad and boxy emission lines (Dessart & Hillier 2022). Maeda et al (2023) further proposed that SN 2018ivc and a fraction of SNe IIL may be a direct link between SNe IIb and SNe IIP in the binary evolution where the sequence of SNe Ic/Ib-IIb-(some) IIL-IIP is mainly controlled by the initial orbital separation. This is along the same line as previously suggested by Nomoto et al (1995Nomoto et al ( , 1996 but with a substantial difference in the mode of binary interaction (see Section 4 for more details).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a scenario may also be in line with its optical spectral features showing broad and boxy emission lines (Dessart & Hillier 2022). Maeda et al (2023) further proposed that SN 2018ivc and a fraction of SNe IIL may be a direct link between SNe IIb and SNe IIP in the binary evolution where the sequence of SNe Ic/Ib-IIb-(some) IIL-IIP is mainly controlled by the initial orbital separation. This is along the same line as previously suggested by Nomoto et al (1995Nomoto et al ( , 1996 but with a substantial difference in the mode of binary interaction (see Section 4 for more details).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Discovered by the D < 40 Mpc SN survey (Tartaglia et al 2018) on 2018 November 24 (UT) within a day of the explosion (Valenti et al 2018;Bostroem et al 2020), SN 2018ivc is an outlier of the SN IIL subclass with its faint and rapidly evolving optical light curve. Maeda et al (2023) presented and analyzed the data taken by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) covering 4-198 days since the (well-determined) explosion date, together with the optical and X-ray light curves. They suggested that SN 2018ivc is indeed an analog of an SN IIb explosion (potentially with a slightly more massive H-rich envelope), with its different observational features from canonical SNe IIb originating in its powering mechanism, the SN-CSM interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that other SNe IIb with little synthesized 56 Ni may be undercounted due to their rapidly-fading or underluminous light curves. Maeda et al (2023) also concluded that the light curve of SN 2018ivc was powered at least in part by circumstellar interaction. Sustained circumstellar interaction has been inferred for other SNe IIb, either through late-time spectral features (Maeda et al 2015;Fremling et al 2019) or through X-ray and radio observations (Fransson et al 1996).…”
Section: Bolometric Luminosities and Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, in the case of SN 2018ivc, both a low 56 Ni mass (M Ni ≤ 0.015M ) and progenitor mass (M ZAMS 12M ) are inferred (Maeda et al 2023). It is possible that other SNe IIb with little synthesized 56 Ni may be undercounted due to their rapidly-fading or underluminous light curves.…”
Section: Bolometric Luminosities and Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation