2013
DOI: 10.1111/coa.12046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A musculoperiosteal flap cochlear implant device fixation technique: Our experience in one hundred and seventy nine patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some details of the surgical approach described here are slightly different from companies' instructions for use, in which suture-fixation of the device is recommended. In fact, many surgeons have documented good results through relying on a tight periosteal pocket to maintain placement and stability of the device in lieu of suture fixation [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Hence it is a common practice with reasonably safe outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some details of the surgical approach described here are slightly different from companies' instructions for use, in which suture-fixation of the device is recommended. In fact, many surgeons have documented good results through relying on a tight periosteal pocket to maintain placement and stability of the device in lieu of suture fixation [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Hence it is a common practice with reasonably safe outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this original description of the temporalis subperiosteal pocket, the use of a pericranial suture was described. Other surgeons have sought to avoid the need for suture fixation, but they utilize a bony recess or other modifications in an effort to secure the device …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other surgeons have sought to avoid the need for suture fixation, but they utilize a bony recess or other modifications in an effort to secure the device. [9][10][11][12] The tight temporalis pocket technique, including suture and/or bony recess, has been favorably compared to standard techniques. 13,14 Promising outcomes from authors eliminating either suture fixation or bony recess creation naturally proceeds to the question of whether a well-made tight pocket alone could properly secure a CI R/S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%