2008
DOI: 10.1021/nn800508f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Nanoengineering Approach for Investigation and Regulation of Protein Immobilization

Abstract: It is known that protein attachment to surfaces depends sensitively upon the local structure and environment of the binding sites at the nanometer scale. Using nanografting and reversal nanografting, both atomic force microscopy (AFM) - based lithography techniques, protein binding sites with well-defined local environments are designed and engineered with nanometer precision. Three proteins, goat-anti-biotin Immunoglobulin G (IgG), lysozyme and rabbit-Immunoglobulin G, are immobilized onto these engineered su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
197
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
197
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were supported by HR-SEM that showed the spherical morphology of all the NPs and the change of the surface topography from a very smooth for R-NPs to a patterned one for IgG3-NPs and 3F8-NPs (Figure 1). In the latter two, the conjugated antibodies were visualized as small dots (<20 nm), as previously reported upon the conjugation of other proteins to polymeric NPs [40] and in line with the reported size of IgG antibodies [41]. Upon analysis of the non-conjugated fraction of antibody in the supernatant of the reaction, the calculated efficiency of the conjugation process was 96.7 ± 3.0%, i.e., most of the antibody reacted with the NPs in the selected conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These results were supported by HR-SEM that showed the spherical morphology of all the NPs and the change of the surface topography from a very smooth for R-NPs to a patterned one for IgG3-NPs and 3F8-NPs (Figure 1). In the latter two, the conjugated antibodies were visualized as small dots (<20 nm), as previously reported upon the conjugation of other proteins to polymeric NPs [40] and in line with the reported size of IgG antibodies [41]. Upon analysis of the non-conjugated fraction of antibody in the supernatant of the reaction, the calculated efficiency of the conjugation process was 96.7 ± 3.0%, i.e., most of the antibody reacted with the NPs in the selected conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Ab coverage was determined to be 4.3 ± 2.2 Abs/NP, equivalent to an Ab footprint of 232.6 nm 2 per Ab using the calculated surface area of a NP of 1000 nm 2 . 24 The dimensions of a typical IgG antibody of 14.5, 8.5, and 4 nm, 33 which has an average footprint of 81.3 nm 2 , suggest that the coverage is less than a monolayer. However, it is of note that even if the Ab had a high coverage resulting in a multilayer on the NPs, it does not preclude the NP-Ab from being able function in an immunoassay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the size of the immobilized antibody is similar to that of the "Y" model size of the IgG antibody (Peace III et al and Tan et al). 40,41 Therefore, we conclude that antibody "Y" immobilized on the PS microsphere surface is a monolayer.…”
Section: Wgm Spectra Evaluation Of the Antibody Immobilization Ps Micmentioning
confidence: 72%