2024
DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Narrative Review of Self-Reported Scales to Evaluate Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients

Diana Raluca Velescu,
Monica Steluta Marc,
Daniel Traila
et al.

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent chronic condition that has been associated with mental disorders like depression and anxiety. This study intends to provide a practical overview of the most relevant self-reported and self-rating scales that assess depression and anxiety in OSA patients. Materials and Methods: A search for articles was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar using a combination of words for obstructive sleep apnea, depression, anxiety,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SDS is the commonly used self-rating scale (next to the Beck Depression Scale–BDI). The high reliability of the scale confirmed in research justifies its use ( Dunstan, Scott & Todd, 2017 ; Velescu et al, 2024 ). It includes 20 symptoms divided into four groups: mood disturbances, physiological functions, psychomotor activity, and psychiatric symptoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SDS is the commonly used self-rating scale (next to the Beck Depression Scale–BDI). The high reliability of the scale confirmed in research justifies its use ( Dunstan, Scott & Todd, 2017 ; Velescu et al, 2024 ). It includes 20 symptoms divided into four groups: mood disturbances, physiological functions, psychomotor activity, and psychiatric symptoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A cut-off point ≥50 for raw scores is recommended ( Dunstan & Scott, 2018 ; Velescu et al, 2024 ). For the 50-point cut-off applied by many researchers, sensitivity is 78.9% and specificity is 83.7% ( Dunstan & Scott, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%