2000
DOI: 10.2307/2585829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. American Political Science Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to THE CURRENT WISDOM: SMALL WAS BEAUTIFUL IN AMERICAN CIVIC LIFE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
209
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
209
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 While these are core issues in organizational research, local associations have been examined in only a handful of cases, often relating this to a historical analysis of the period under study (Gamm & Putnam, 1999;Sandell, 2001;Selle & Øymyr, 1992;Skocpol, 2003;Skocpol, Ganz, & Munson, 2000). Thus, we have much less systematic knowledge concerning the operations of such organizations, than e.g.…”
Section: Local Voluntary Associations: Why Should We Care?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 While these are core issues in organizational research, local associations have been examined in only a handful of cases, often relating this to a historical analysis of the period under study (Gamm & Putnam, 1999;Sandell, 2001;Selle & Øymyr, 1992;Skocpol, 2003;Skocpol, Ganz, & Munson, 2000). Thus, we have much less systematic knowledge concerning the operations of such organizations, than e.g.…”
Section: Local Voluntary Associations: Why Should We Care?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes, firstly, the literature on social movements and mass membership organizations (Della Porta & Diani, 2005;Skocpol, 2003). Institutional ties from the individual into the political system are decisive if organizations are to express and institutionalize value pluralism in society and create integration out of conflict, and nonpolitical, purely local initiatives are insufficient in order to fill this role (Skocpol, 1999a(Skocpol, , 2003Skocpol et al, 2000). Secondly, deliberative democracy and public sphere theory (Cohen & Arato, 1992) sees civil society is an arena for argument, deliberation, association and collaboration.…”
Section: How? the Dynamics Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of scholars have come to conflicting conclusions (e.g. Boyte and Kari 1996;Eckstein 2001;Paxton 1999;Rotolo 1999;Skocpol 1996Skocpol , 1999Skocpol , 2003Weir and Ganz 1997;Skocpol and Fiorina 1999;Skocpol et al 2000;Sirianni and Friedland 2001;Wuthnow 2004), in many cases focusing on the ways that Americans do engage civically. Some of these studies have looked at how disconnected individuals become civically engaged as a means of self-fulfillment (Lichterman 1995(Lichterman , 1996Westphal 2003;Wuthnow 1991Wuthnow , 1998see also McCarthy 1987;Jasper and Poulsen 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the membership approach, scholars like Putnam (2000) and Skocpol, Ganz, and Munson (2000) emphasized the benefits (e. g., social capital, trust, norms) accrued from intense interactions within civic associations. Putnam (2000) believed that frequent face-to-face contact between members helps foster societal trust and cooperative behavior which are essential to the vitality of American democracy.…”
Section: The Intensity Of Organizational Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He claimed that social capital in the United States is declining, because active voluntary associations are being replaced by growing tertiary organizations (i. e., mailing list) in which members do not interact personally. Skocpol, Ganz, and Munson (2000) took it one step further and proposed that multi-tiered national federations consisting of robust local chapters are key supports of classic American voluntarism because they offer an institutional framework in which nationwide leadership networks are sustained and career lines, resources, and incentives for membership organizers are provided. Individuals participate in civic associations by engaging in or even shaping organizational activities, which include going to meetings where they take part in decision making, planning or chairing a meeting, giving public speeches, among others.…”
Section: The Intensity Of Organizational Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%