1997
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/89.23.1758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome: Meeting Highlights and Bethesda Guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
592
0
25

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 999 publications
(621 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
592
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical utility of such an assay is well recognized for screening of suspicious tumors to initiate the process of identifying HNPCC families. 20,22 The assay may also be useful as a prognostic marker 18,19 or potentially in the elucidation of the pharmacogenetic properties of a tumor (SR Hamilton, submitted).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clinical utility of such an assay is well recognized for screening of suspicious tumors to initiate the process of identifying HNPCC families. 20,22 The assay may also be useful as a prognostic marker 18,19 or potentially in the elucidation of the pharmacogenetic properties of a tumor (SR Hamilton, submitted).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 Thus, it may become important clinically to identify tumors with MSI not only to implicate germline MMR defects (HNPCC families), but also for prognostic stratification. While clinical (Bethesda guidelines 20 ) and histopathological features 21 may raise the suspicion that a colorectal tumor is microsatellite-unstable and perhaps has arisen in an HNPCC family, clinicopathological features are insufficient to diagnose the presence of MSI; thus, direct molecular testing has importance in documenting the MSI status of a clinically suspicious tumor. 22 Many different microsatellite markers or loci have been used by different investigators to identify MSI in tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific guideline(s) that the participant met was captured. An individual was categorized as “Bethesda 1” if diagnosed under 50 and “Bethesda 2” if they had an additional Lynch syndrome-associated cancer diagnoses 25, 26 . Individuals with one or more first-degree relatives with a Lynch syndrome-associated tumor, with one of the cancers being diagnosed under age 50 years, was categorized as “Bethesda 4.” Participants with two or more first- or second-degree relatives with Lynch syndrome-associated tumors, regardless of age of diagnosis, were categorized as “Bethesda 5.” The Bethesda guideline 3 pertaining to MSI-histology (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, Crohn's-like lymphocytic reaction, mucin/signet ring cell differentiation, medullary growth pattern) was not included in this study, as pathology reports did not uniformly capture these features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Germline mutations in MMR genes can lead to a variety of clinical presentations, including sporadic early-onset colorectal cancer and familial endometrial cancer (Farrington et al, 1998;Wijnen et al, 1999). Therefore, additional clinical criteria were developed which may indicate an MMR gene defect, in particular the Bethesda and Amsterdam II criteria (Rodriguez-Bigas et al, 1997;Vasen et al, 1999). Identification of a germline defect in colorectal cancer patients is crucial to establish the etiology of the disease and to direct clinical decision making for patients and family members.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%