2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A national study on the physical and mental health of intersex adults in the U.S.

Abstract: Objectives To describe the health of intersex adults (people with differences of sex development) in the U.S. using community-based research methods. Methods In July-September 2018, we conducted a national health study of intersex adults aged 18 and older in the U.S., using a survey hosted on Qualtrics. The study describes the physical and mental health experiences of intersex adults, including differences by age (18 to 39 vs. 40 and older). Questions were derived from national (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveill… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, the influence of these factors on mitochondrial health could supersede that of sex assigned at birth, making the binary classification of limited use and possibly obscuring meaningful gender/sex‐related variation. Research findings guided solely by a binary sex construct also are of limited applicability to TGD individuals, who represent a non‐negligible and increasing fraction of the general population, 40 and to intersex individuals 80,81 . A complete discussion of the limitations of binary sex constructs is beyond the scope of this meta‐analysis but is explored elsewhere 32–34,82,83 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the influence of these factors on mitochondrial health could supersede that of sex assigned at birth, making the binary classification of limited use and possibly obscuring meaningful gender/sex‐related variation. Research findings guided solely by a binary sex construct also are of limited applicability to TGD individuals, who represent a non‐negligible and increasing fraction of the general population, 40 and to intersex individuals 80,81 . A complete discussion of the limitations of binary sex constructs is beyond the scope of this meta‐analysis but is explored elsewhere 32–34,82,83 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being born with intersex can impact physical,15 16 psychosocial16 17 and familial18 19 experiences at organisational,20 21 policy,22–24 cultural and community levels 25. Psychosocial studies have illuminated a range of concerns for individuals with intersex linked to quality of life, trauma, mistrust, mental health concerns and isolation 26–28. Despite shifts in legislation globally, emerging emancipatory studies,20 29 human rights champions and leaders,30 31 and heightened public awareness of diversity,32 33 healthcare across the lifespan for individuals with intersex can be compromised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the influence of these factors on mitochondrial health could supersede that of sex assigned at birth, making the binary classification of limited use, possibly obscuring meaningful gender/sex-related variation. Research findings guided solely by a binary sex construct also are of limited applicability to TGD individuals, who represent a non-negligible and increasing fraction of the general population (37), and to intersex individuals (77, 78). A complete discussion of the limitations of binary sex constructs are beyond the scope of this meta-analysis but are explored elsewhere (29-31, 79, 80).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%