2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A natural experiment on the impact of overabundant deer on songbird populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
118
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For birds the sampling unit was the island and we analyzed trends in the number of bird species, total number of individuals and species diversity per island. Based on the results of Allombert et al (2005b) we only included those bird species that were dependant on the understorey for feeding and/or nesting. …”
Section: Analysis Of Variation In Indices Of Species Density Abundanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For birds the sampling unit was the island and we analyzed trends in the number of bird species, total number of individuals and species diversity per island. Based on the results of Allombert et al (2005b) we only included those bird species that were dependant on the understorey for feeding and/or nesting. …”
Section: Analysis Of Variation In Indices Of Species Density Abundanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling of song birds Allombert et al (2005b) studied bird assemblages of the different islands (no distinction made between shoreline and interior) by two methods: point-counts and spot-mapping. Both methods yielded similar results.…”
Section: Sampling Of Invertebrates and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These indirect effects are wide-ranging, including songbirds (Allombert et al 2005), wildcat populations (Lozano et al 2007), insect populations (Brousseau et al 2013), and even belowground communities (Lessard et al 2012). It is inherently diffi cult to include other organisms in grid-based inventories and therefore ecosystem perspectives have not been suffi ciently recognized in the past.…”
Section: Ecosystem Consequences Of Tree Diversity Losses To Other Orgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For resource managers, impacts from ungulates on vegetation are becoming a common management problem [105][106][107][108][109], while options for controlling ungulate populations by slaughter, translocation and reproductive control receive little public and/or government support [110]. Translocation receives the greatest level of public support, but disease concerns have reduced the safety of translocating wildlife [111][112][113][114].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%