2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A natural stress boundary integral equation for calculating the near boundary stress field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing with the analytical method, the numerical method has lower precision, but it is more suitable for the engineering application. The numerical methods, such as the finite element method, [29][30][31][32] the boundary element method [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and the boundary finite element method, 40,41 are used to analyse the stress singularity in the vicinity at the vertex of the V-notch.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing with the analytical method, the numerical method has lower precision, but it is more suitable for the engineering application. The numerical methods, such as the finite element method, [29][30][31][32] the boundary element method [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and the boundary finite element method, 40,41 are used to analyse the stress singularity in the vicinity at the vertex of the V-notch.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional numerical method can be used to analyse this remaining part. Experience has shown that the boundary element method has significant advantages in giving more accurate results with much less computational resources needed in comparison with other numerical methods 23–28 . For the elasticity problems, the displacement at any point y on the boundary of the problem domain can be presented by the displacement BIE where y is the source or load point and x the field point, i , j = 1, 2 for 2D problems.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Intensity Coefficients Ak By Bemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experience has shown that the boundary element method has significant advantages in giving more accurate results with much less computational resources needed in comparison with other numerical methods. [23][24][25][26][27][28] For the elasticity problems, the displacement at any point y on the boundary of the problem domain can be presented by the displacement BIE…”
Section: E V a L U A T I O N O F T H E I N T E N S I T Y C O E F F I mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the unknown displacement and traction on boundary are solved by the boundary integral equation, any physical values of interested interior points can be yielded successfully by the integral equations of interior points. The BEM has been successfully applied to solving multidiscipline problems, such as the potential problem (Zhou et al , 2008; Cheng et al , 2015), the elastic problem (Niu et al , 2005; Cheng et al , 2011) and the vibration problem (Zheng et al , 2016; Tsiatas and Yiotis, 2013). However, the FGM has to be divided into many subdomains when the conventional BEM is used to model it, which will increase the computational amount redundantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%