A Navigated Mechatronic System with Haptic Features to Assist in Surgical Interventions

Pieck, S.; Gross, I.; Knappe, Peter; Kuenzler, S.; Kerschbaumer, F.; Wahrburg, Jürgen

doi:10.3109/10929080309146067

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Beispiele dafür sind die Auswertung präoperativ gewonnener CT-oder MR-Schnittbilder, die entweder vom Chirurgen alleine ("manuell") oder mit unterschiedlich ausgeprägter Automationsunterstützung vollzogen werden kann. Eine auto- Hoch 5 aktiv passiv aktiv passiv aktiv passiv "Chirurgie-Automat": Analyse, Entscheidung und Ausführung in der Hand der Maschine 4 aktiv passiv aktiv aktiv aktiv passiv (1) automatischer Fräsroboter Keilbeinhöhle (2) Fräsroboter Mastoid Mittel 3 aktiv aktiv aktiv aktiv aktiv aktiv navigiert-kontrollierte Fräse/ Shaver mit automatischer Segmentation des Arbeitsraumes 2 aktiv aktiv passiv aktiv aktiv aktiv (1) navigiert-kontrollierte Fräse/Shaver mit manueller Segmentation des Arbeitsraumes (2) Arbeitsraumbeschränkungen durch chirurgische Manipulatoren [31] Niedrig 1 aktiv aktiv passiv aktiv passiv aktiv (1) konventionelles Navigationssystem, das CT Daten während der OP anbietet (2) Neuromonitoring N.facialis (3) Biopsieroboter mit manuellem Vorschub [6] Keine 0 passiv aktiv passiv aktiv passiv aktiv…”

Section: Unzureichende Untersuchungen Zu Auswirkungen Chirurgischer Aunclassified

Automation in der HNO-Chirurgie

Strauß

Meixensberger²,

Dietz³

et al. 2007

Laryngorhinootologie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Surgical assistance systems permit a misalignment from the purely manual to an assisted activity of the surgeon (automation). Automation defines a system, that partly or totally fulfils function, those was carried out before totally or partly by the user. The organization of surgical assistance systems following application (planning, simulation, intraoperative navigation and visualization) or technical configuration of the system (manipulator, robot) is not suitable for a description of the interaction between user (surgeon) and the system. The available work has the goal of providing a classification for the degree of the automation of surgical interventions and describing by examples. The presented classification orients itself at pre-working from the Human-Factors-Sciences. As a condition for an automation of a surgical intervention applies that an assumption of a task, which was alone assigned so far to the surgeon takes place via the system. For both reference objects (humans and machine) the condition passively or actively comes into consideration. Besides can be classified according to which functions are taken over during a selected function division by humans and/or the surgical assistance system. Three functional areas were differentiated: "information acquisition and -analysis", "decision making and action planning" as well as "execution of the surgical action". From this results a classification of pre- and intraoperative surgical assist systems in six categories, which represent different automation degrees. The classification pattern is described and illustrated on the basis of surgical of examples.

show abstract

Section: Unzureichende Untersuchungen Zu Auswirkungen Chirurgischer Aunclassified

Automation in der HNO-Chirurgie

Strauß

Meixensberger²,

Dietz³

et al. 2007

Laryngorhinootologie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One of the goals of this system is non-invasive patient fixation, aiding the robotic system by an infrared tracking system. Although the combination of a robotic milling or assistance tool with a navigational system has already been clinically tested (16,17), no data are available regarding the deviations of the milled bone that have to be expected during the active milling process. Because of this, it was necessary to determine the extent of fixation that can be achieved by non-invasive methods and thereby determine the extent and range of motion that has to be tracked and transmitted from the navigational to the robotic control system.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%