2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0483(01)00046-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A near-optimal heuristic for the sequencing problem in multiple-batch flow-shops with small equal sublots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to [12], the results are categorised into three levels of weak, medium and strong P1 dominance as shown in Table 8 where n equals number of jobs.…”
Section: Bam3 Heuristic Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to [12], the results are categorised into three levels of weak, medium and strong P1 dominance as shown in Table 8 where n equals number of jobs.…”
Section: Bam3 Heuristic Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes shifting bottleneck heuristic [10,11] and bottleneck minimal idleness heuristic [12,13]. However, not much progress is reported on bottleneck approach in solving re-entrant flow shop problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the m-machine lot-streaming flow shop problem, Kumar, Bagchi and Sriskandarajah (2000) extended the approach presented by Sriskandarajah and Wagneur (1999) to the m-machine case. Later, Kalir and Sarin (2001) proposed a bottleneck minimal idleness heuristic to sequence a set of batches to be processed in equal sub-lots for minimizing makespan. Yoon and Ventura (2002b) developed sixteen pairwise interchange methods to optimize the mean weighted absolute deviation from due dates.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were first studied in an m/1/E problem, where setup times were considered (Truscott, 1985). Later on a bottleneck minimal idleness heuristic (BMI) was developed to generate solutions that were very close to the optimum (Kalir & Sarin, 2001). For the m/N/E problem, the BMI model was extended to n jobs but it did not consider setup times on it (Kalir & Sarin, 2001).…”
Section: Lot Streaming In M-stage Flow Shopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later on a bottleneck minimal idleness heuristic (BMI) was developed to generate solutions that were very close to the optimum (Kalir & Sarin, 2001). For the m/N/E problem, the BMI model was extended to n jobs but it did not consider setup times on it (Kalir & Sarin, 2001). Other paper used integer programming to determine optimum sublot sizes while enumerating the number of sublots for an n jobs problem using discrete values (Huq, Cutright & Martin, 2004).…”
Section: Lot Streaming In M-stage Flow Shopmentioning
confidence: 99%