A near-peer regional surgical teaching programme designed by medical students, delivered by junior doctors

Abstract

Background: Near-peer teaching initiatives has been shown to be a highly successful method of improving student learning. There has been little data on surgical teaching initiatives of this kind and little data to show if this improves student confidence in surgical topics. This study was designed to show whether a regional surgical teaching programme, delivered by junior doctors, improves confidence levels of students prior to their final examinations. Method: Final year medical students were invited from four hospitals in the Northern deanery of England to participate in a voluntary surgical teaching day. Junior doctors were then recruited to present on various surgical topics based on their own knowledge and experience of finals examinations and working on the wards. A pre and post-course questionnaire was designed, validated and distributed to the students to assess their confidence on a five-point Likert scale of 1-5 (1-most confidence, 5-least confidence) levels in each of the 11 chosen topics. Other variables were also measured relating to the topics including visual material, enthusiasm, content relevance and communication. Results: 53 students completed the questionnaire (n = 53). There were 31 females and 22 males with a mean age of 24.7. A mean level of confidence of 2.7 pre-course and 1.6 post-course showed an increase in confidence by 68.8%. All eleven topics covered showed improvement in confidence. General Surgical Principles showed the lowest improvement in confidence from 2.683 to 1.917 (p = <0.001) compared to endocrine which showed the maximum increased in confidence from 3.650 to 1.694 (p = <0.0001). Orthopedics showed an increased in confidence from 3.010 to 1.62 (p = <0.0001). Conclusion: Near-peer education designed by medical students and delivered by junior doctors is an effective way for improving confidence levels and test results prior to finals examination and is also valuable for junior doctors.

Students’ and lecturers’ perspective on the implementation of online learning in dental education due to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): a cross-sectional study

“…To achieve the highest possible educational success, it is important to involve all participants in the teaching process [ 16 , 23 ]. Therefore, the implementation of online learning due to COVID-19 was evaluated using a Likert scale, the standard procedure for surveys in the field of medicine [ 17 , 19 , 24 , 25 ].…”

Undergraduate dental students’ perspective on the implementation of digital dentistry in the preclinical curriculum: a questionnaire survey

“…Margaryan et al described the high relevance of involving students in teaching and respecting their preferences of teaching methods to achieve the highest possible educational success [24]. Therefore, the training modules of the present study were evaluated using a Likert scale, which is a standard procedure for surveys in the field of medicine [26][27][28].…”

Clinical Orthopaedic Teaching programme for Students (COTS)

“…The undergraduate medical curriculum does not regularly dedicate time to the teaching of educational theory and delivery. 39 40 A precourse orientation workshop was organised to tackle this problem. Gottlieb et al found that creating a formal teaching workshop prior to the commencement of a teaching course reduces the issues surrounding the preparation of teaching sessions.…”

“…42 With the varying amount of questions used in other NPT programme tests, a further validated tool is required to determine the number of questions required in each test to provide a perfect balance between not detracting from valuable session time while also giving a true assessment of students’ knowledge. 40 43 44…”