2007
DOI: 10.1080/08912960601118651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nearly complete skeleton of an early juvenile diplodocid (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) from the Lower Morrison Formation (Late Jurassic) of north central Wyoming and its implications for early ontogeny and pneumaticity in sauropods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
101
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the presence of unfused vertebral elements and/or open neurocentral sutures on the external vertebral surfaces has been routinely used to identify relatively immature individuals for especially nonavian dinosaurs (Fig. 1); for example sauropods (Tidwell and Carpenter, 2003;Ikejiri et al, 2005;Schwarz et al, 2007;Kutty et al, 2007), theropods (Carpenter, 1997;Currie and Chen, 2001;Currie and Zhiming, 2001;Carrano et al, 2002Carrano et al, , 2005Carr et al, 2005), ornithischians (Tereshchenko, 2001;Suzuki et al, 2004). However, until intra-and interspecific variation in timing of neurocentral fusion is understood, the nature of the neurocentral sutures as an indicator of relative skeletal maturity remains questionable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the presence of unfused vertebral elements and/or open neurocentral sutures on the external vertebral surfaces has been routinely used to identify relatively immature individuals for especially nonavian dinosaurs (Fig. 1); for example sauropods (Tidwell and Carpenter, 2003;Ikejiri et al, 2005;Schwarz et al, 2007;Kutty et al, 2007), theropods (Carpenter, 1997;Currie and Chen, 2001;Currie and Zhiming, 2001;Carrano et al, 2002Carrano et al, , 2005Carr et al, 2005), ornithischians (Tereshchenko, 2001;Suzuki et al, 2004). However, until intra-and interspecific variation in timing of neurocentral fusion is understood, the nature of the neurocentral sutures as an indicator of relative skeletal maturity remains questionable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been estimated that juveniles account for approximately one-sixth of the total number of sauropod specimens recovered from the famous Upper Jurassic (Tithonian) exposures of the Morrison Formation in the western USA (Foster 2005). Although recent work on sauropod histology has revealed critical information on their growth rates and life history strategies (e.g., Curry 1999;Sander 2000;Curry Rogers and Erickson 2005;Woodward and Lehman 2009;Sander et al 2011), the dearth of embryonic, hatchling and juvenile material has hampered a broader understanding of sauropod ontogeny, although some work has revealed substantial age-related differences in morphology and ecology (e.g., Ikejiri et al 2005;Schwarz et al 2007;Whitlock et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable material of baby and juvenile sauropods recovered from the Morrison Formation includes: a complete skeleton of Camarasaurus (Gilmore 1925); a Diplodocus skull (Whitlock et al 2010); the holotype specimen of Brontosaurus (= Elosaurus) parvus (Carpenter and McIntosh 1994); a partial skeleton of an unnamed brachiosaurid (Schwarz et al 2007;Carballido et al 2012); and other undescribed diplodocid material (Myers and Storrs 2007). In addition, an assortment of more fragmentary specimens has also been reported from this unit, comprising an isolated premaxilla (Britt and Naylor 1994) and vertebral and limb material (Carpenter and McIntosh 1994;Foster 2005) Díaz et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stratigraphic position of the Howe-Stephens Quarry can thus only be established with certainty in relation to the other quarries located on the Howe Ranch. The Howe-Stephens Quarry lies approximately 35 m above the marine Middle to Upper Jurassic Sundance Formation, and 30 m below the terrestrial Lower Cretaceous Cloverly Formation (Schwarz et al, 2007a;Christiansen and Tschopp, 2010). It is stratigraphically slightly higher than the Howe Quarry, but like all the excavation sites on Howe Ranch, it is located beneath the so-called clay change (see Schwarz et al, 2007a, figure 3), which was used for long-distance correlation by Turner and Peterson (1999) and Ikejiri (2004Ikejiri ( , 2005.…”
Section: Stratigraphy and Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Howe-Stephens Quarry lies approximately 35 m above the marine Middle to Upper Jurassic Sundance Formation, and 30 m below the terrestrial Lower Cretaceous Cloverly Formation (Schwarz et al, 2007a;Christiansen and Tschopp, 2010). It is stratigraphically slightly higher than the Howe Quarry, but like all the excavation sites on Howe Ranch, it is located beneath the so-called clay change (see Schwarz et al, 2007a, figure 3), which was used for long-distance correlation by Turner and Peterson (1999) and Ikejiri (2004Ikejiri ( , 2005. The site was dated to 147 Ma by Kvale et al (2001, figure 5), based on its position somewhat above a bentonite layer dated to 151.5 +/-4.0 Ma (Kvale et al, 2001, table 1).…”
Section: Stratigraphy and Agementioning
confidence: 99%