A need for recalibrating access and benefit sharing

Sara, Rodrigo; Wyss, Markus; Custers, René; Veld, Anouk in 't; Muyldermans, Dominic

doi:10.15252/embr.202153973

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All in all, and in line with other authors (e.g., [29][30][31][32]), we believe that the entire approach to the fair and equitable sharing of benefits for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity needs to be fundamentally reviewed and revised. Such revision should resolve the complexities and constraints mentioned in this paper, and reconcile the needs of users with realistic expectations of provider countries.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%

Facing the Harsh Reality of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Legislation: An Industry Perspective

Michiels¹,

Feiter²,

Paquin-Jaloux

et al. 2021

Sustainability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Access and benefit sharing (ABS) is a framework which refers to a relatively recent type of legal requirements for access to and use of “genetic resources”. They are based on diverse national and regional laws and regulations, which mostly result from the implementation of the United Nations’ Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and its supplementary agreement, the Nagoya Protocol. Their ambition is to achieve fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of the use of genetic resources as an incentive to conserve and sustainably use them. This paper describes the experiences, practical constraints and complexities encountered by users of genetic resources when dealing with ABS legislation, with a focus on users from the private sector. We provide insights on how ABS laws have fundamentally changed the way of working with genetic resources, in the hope that it inspires re-thinking of the ABS framework, to better support the overall objectives of the CBD.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%

Facing the Harsh Reality of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Legislation: An Industry Perspective

Michiels¹,

Feiter²,

Paquin-Jaloux

et al. 2021

Sustainability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The need to understand the value attached to KWP also has a more general motivation stemming from the increasing importance placed on enabling benefit sharing arrangements (Laird et al, 2020;Sara et al, 2022 A growing body of literature on benefit sharing has focussed on the NP. This is because the NP has a specific focus on access and benefit sharing (ABS) from the "utilisation" of genetic material.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating consumer preferences for known wild provenance of plants within the horticultural trade

Blackhall-Miles

Fraser

Roberts

2023

Plants People Planet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although significant advances have been made in implementing international mechanisms to support the benefit sharing of natural resources in low and middle income countries, there are limited practical examples. Our research examines how the ornamental horticulture sector might be able to meet its benefit sharing requirements.Employing a consumer survey, we reveal the potential for monetary benefit sharing to emerge for plants with Known Wild Provenance. Our results indicate that although consumers value plants that have their Known Wild Provenance clearly labelled, the magnitude of this estimate is insufficient to generate meaningful monetary benefits. Summary• The global trade in ornamental plants is significant and growing. Historically, the relationship between the acquisition of novel plants from the wild for use in ornamental horticulture has been referred to as plant hunting. However, questions are now being raised about the ethical utilisation of biological resources and if those countries providing access to material from the wild are receiving adequate benefits. It is in this context that we examine if plants of Known Wild Provenance (KWP) are valued by UK consumers, and if a potential premium could be the basis of a benefit-sharing agreement.• Employing a choice experiment, we assess consumers' preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for KWP.• Our analysis reveals that KWP did not prove to be a strong driver for plant buyers.• Although a positive WTP is generated it is relatively small. Thus, the ability of commercial horticulture to provide monetary benefits to support benefit sharing is likely limited. This result raises questions as to how benefit sharing might then be implemented if buyers of plants are not prepared to pay a price premium.

show abstract

Indigenous peoples’ rights should be recognized and strengthened to boost food innovation research

Adhikari,

Sherman,

Marrie

et al. 2024

Nat Food

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A need for recalibrating access and benefit sharing

Cited by 6 publications

References 13 publications

Facing the Harsh Reality of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Legislation: An Industry Perspective

Facing the Harsh Reality of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Legislation: An Industry Perspective

Investigating consumer preferences for known wild provenance of plants within the horticultural trade

Indigenous peoples’ rights should be recognized and strengthened to boost food innovation research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About