2020
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A needle trap device packed with MIL‐100(Fe) metal organic frameworks for efficient headspace sampling and analysis of urinary BTEXs

Abstract: The aim of this study was to develop a new method for the determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene isomers (BTEXs) in urine samples. In this method, MIL‐100(Fe)@Fe3O4@SiO2 metal–organic framework was synthesized, characterized and packed inside a needle trap device (NTD) as a sorbent for headspace extraction of unmetabolized BTEXs from urine samples followed by gas chromatography (GC) analysis. The GC device was equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID). The results showed that the opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 10 Furthermore, the reported detection limits and quantitation limits to determine the concentration of BTEXs in the urine samples by the HS-SPME:MIL-100–Fe:GC-FID method were in the range of 0.0001–0.0005 and 0.0003 to 0.0014 μg mL −1 , respectively. 39 Moreover, in the study of Tajik et al , the detection limit and quantitation limit levels of urinary volatile organic compounds sampled by the HS-Cool Fiber-SPME technique were determined to be in the range of 0.02–0.07 and 0.07–0.2 ng mL −1 , respectively. 40 A comparison of the results of this study with the other similar studies proves that the proposed method has lower detection limits and quantitation limits and wider ranges than other previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 Furthermore, the reported detection limits and quantitation limits to determine the concentration of BTEXs in the urine samples by the HS-SPME:MIL-100–Fe:GC-FID method were in the range of 0.0001–0.0005 and 0.0003 to 0.0014 μg mL −1 , respectively. 39 Moreover, in the study of Tajik et al , the detection limit and quantitation limit levels of urinary volatile organic compounds sampled by the HS-Cool Fiber-SPME technique were determined to be in the range of 0.02–0.07 and 0.07–0.2 ng mL −1 , respectively. 40 A comparison of the results of this study with the other similar studies proves that the proposed method has lower detection limits and quantitation limits and wider ranges than other previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the needle trap method has been used to sample volatile compounds in urine and breath with three new sorbents, including single‐wall carbon nanotube (SW‐CNT) mix to sol–gel adsorbent (Zeverdegani, Bahrami, Rismanchian, & Shahna, 2014; Zeverdegani, Bahrami, Shahna, et al, 2014), titanium dioxide–polyaniline core–shell nanocomposite (Banihashemi & Bagheri, 2017) and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) (Saedi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Spmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these compounds have a high adsorption capacity, they have a small granule size. In this regard, the needle's packing can cause a pressure drop and even blockage of the needle during sampling (Saedi et al, 2020). These compounds also cannot tolerate temperatures above 280°C owing to their broken framework.…”
Section: Spmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooperative gaminal and vinylogous ABO has been reviewed (Figure 1, Parts II and III). 30,31 Behind the chemical studies, many efforts have been done to access a mild and green condition for the electrosynthesis and application of MOFs [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] . Anodic and cathodic electrosynthesis methods are the important techniques that recently have been used for the preparation of various kinds of MOFs [39][40][41][42][43][44] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%