2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2019.106418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A negative energy balance during the peri-implantational period reduces dam IGF-1 but does not alter progesterone or pregnancy-specific protein B (PSPB) or fertility in suckled cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, the control group (CONTROL, 574 ± 8.9 kg live weight (LW); 2.80 ± 0.038 body condition score (BCS) on a 5 point scale [20]) was fed a diet that supplied 100% of the estimated energy requirements for cow maintenance, lactation, and gestation; and the nutrient-restricted group (SUBNUT, 568 ± 7.6 kg LW; 2.86 ± 0.032 BCS) received 65% of their requirements. After this treatment phase, the CONTROL group maintained its LW and BCS (583 ± 8.6 kg LW; 2.90 ± 0.040 BCS), whereas they decreased in SUBNUT animals (538 ± 7.2 kg LW; 2.65 ± 0.033 BCS, p < 0.001), reported by Noya et al [21]. All dams were fed 100% of the requirements during the remainder of gestation and the next lactation, using the same total mixed ration described above.…”
Section: Management During Cow Gestation (Maternal Nutrition Treatmensupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Briefly, the control group (CONTROL, 574 ± 8.9 kg live weight (LW); 2.80 ± 0.038 body condition score (BCS) on a 5 point scale [20]) was fed a diet that supplied 100% of the estimated energy requirements for cow maintenance, lactation, and gestation; and the nutrient-restricted group (SUBNUT, 568 ± 7.6 kg LW; 2.86 ± 0.032 BCS) received 65% of their requirements. After this treatment phase, the CONTROL group maintained its LW and BCS (583 ± 8.6 kg LW; 2.90 ± 0.040 BCS), whereas they decreased in SUBNUT animals (538 ± 7.2 kg LW; 2.65 ± 0.033 BCS, p < 0.001), reported by Noya et al [21]. All dams were fed 100% of the requirements during the remainder of gestation and the next lactation, using the same total mixed ration described above.…”
Section: Management During Cow Gestation (Maternal Nutrition Treatmensupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Maternal nutrient restriction during early gestation reduces the proliferation of ovarian germ-cells and alters the expression of genes that regulate apoptosis in the follicle and granulosa cells, both mechanisms contributing to reduce the number of ovarian primordial follicles [37]. Additionally, we hypothesize that the differences found in IGF-1 concentrations between CONTROL and SUBNUT cows during early pregnancy, which we observed in an earlier phase of this study [21], could have resulted in subsequent changes in fetal hormone levels and in its metabolic pathways, which in turn may have altered gene expression in fetal gonads [38]. Several studies associated a high antral follicle count with improved reproductive efficiency [9,25,35,39], whereas a lower follicle count was related to a reduced lifetime reproductive capacity [40].…”
Section: Heifer Reproductive Performancementioning
confidence: 61%
“…Contrary to the findings of this study, for Serrano-Pérez (2020) found that undernourishment did not affect pregnancy in the first week of gestation, as well progesterone levels (Stephenson et al, 2018;Noya et al, 2020). Sartori et al (2016) showed that Gyr cows had a decrease in blastocyst rate (46.9 Vs. 25.7%) during dry period, in which a diet of 1.7 over the maintenance was offered, for more than 60 days.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…The optimal timing of embryo flushing seems to be outside of the deep NEB period, as was also confirmed by Stadnik et al (2017), when they observed that timing of embryo transfer in the later postpartum period resulted in greater ovarian activity and embryo yield compared to early lactation periods. Noya et al (2020) made the opposite finding in their nutritional experiment. Authors observed better functioning ovaries in the group of cows fed with energy-deficient feed and therefore experiencing deeper negative energy balance compared to the overfed group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%