2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110631
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A negative feedback loop of TOR signaling balances growth and stress-response trade-offs in plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through this series of events, WHIRLY1 may act as a plastidial signal-damping ABA-related stress response. Similar negative feedback loops have already been described in ABA signaling [ 56 , 57 ]. Such function as a platform which in response to different environmental conditions dynamically interacts with different regulatory factors could allow balancing major developmental and stress-related pathways in an environment-sensitive manner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Through this series of events, WHIRLY1 may act as a plastidial signal-damping ABA-related stress response. Similar negative feedback loops have already been described in ABA signaling [ 56 , 57 ]. Such function as a platform which in response to different environmental conditions dynamically interacts with different regulatory factors could allow balancing major developmental and stress-related pathways in an environment-sensitive manner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…To determine whether these mutants show any defect in TOR signaling, seedlings were grown in the media containing either 8 mM or 60 mM sucrose, representing low and high energy environments, respectively. As a source of energy, sucrose is known to promote the growth of the seedlings germinated in vitro and this growth is mediated by TOR signaling [ 26 , 27 ]. However, this response is subdued under a low-energy environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteins represent the effectors of the plant cell, rendering the lack of time-resolved quantitative proteomic data relating to their salt and osmotic stress responses a critical gap in our understanding. Interestingly, plants are proposed to have three stages of abiotic stress response after stress onset, including: a stop phase, quiescent phase and a recovery phase (68, 69), during which, plants modify their growth rate to allocate resources for stress tolerance (70). For example, 5 d-old Arabidopsis seedlings exposed to salt stress revealed that 4 to 5 h after treatment, growth rates rapidly slowed down (stop phase), remaining steady for an additional 4 h (quiescent phase) before recovering growth 13 to 24 h after stress onset (69).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%