2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neoliberal nexus: Economy, security and the biopolitics of citizenship on the border

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
217
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
217
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, local and state governments in the US have played more prominent roles in immigration control and policies since 9/11, thus effectively pushing the border inward (Coleman, 2007;Varsanyi, 2008). These legal technologies are enhanced by biometric technologies that locate borders and boundary enforcement in the bodies of individuals, no matter where those bodies may be located at particular moments and no matter what citizenship is attached to them (Amoore, 2006;Sparke, 2006). The significance of these monitoring technologies for the territoriality of citizenship is that individuals are subject to disciplining -and in the case of immigrants, to deportation -no matter where they may be.…”
Section: The Spatiality Of Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, local and state governments in the US have played more prominent roles in immigration control and policies since 9/11, thus effectively pushing the border inward (Coleman, 2007;Varsanyi, 2008). These legal technologies are enhanced by biometric technologies that locate borders and boundary enforcement in the bodies of individuals, no matter where those bodies may be located at particular moments and no matter what citizenship is attached to them (Amoore, 2006;Sparke, 2006). The significance of these monitoring technologies for the territoriality of citizenship is that individuals are subject to disciplining -and in the case of immigrants, to deportation -no matter where they may be.…”
Section: The Spatiality Of Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, scholars should not only explore how emotional subjectivities emerge in response to citizenship governance (Ho 2009, p.789), but also countenance the possibility that transnational migrant emotional subjectivities may develop in spite of state neoassimilationist invocations of national belonging within overarching frameworks of neoliberal citizenship (Sparke 2006). The governance of transnational migrants has been shown in this paper to be challenging for successive Governments F with cultivating national belonging in the interests of promoting integration and social cohesion; transnational migrants can be seen as troublesome in that they embody distanciated belongings.…”
Section: (Gidwani and Sivaramakrishnan 2003) T Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As will be evident in our discussion, the logics that we identify here generally connect these distinct and disparate practices with dispersed sites emerging through the rationales and logics undergirding the growth of detention. More specifically, nation-states and security industries deploy rationales of deterrence and securitization (including temporal logics of prevention and anticipation), and consistently frame these rationales through narratives of migrants as security threats, rhetoric that illustrates the increasing entanglement of securitization and immigration policies (Dauvergne, 2007;Sparke, 2006). These rationales link migration and mobility to fear-driven national security policies, converting mobility into regimes of containment; borders into regimes of exclusion.…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%