2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of thermal and nonthermal endovenous ablation treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 In another study by Bontinis et al, CAC displayed a decreased risk of post-procedural paresthesia and pigmentation, and induration compared with EVLA. 21, 22 In a study by Kubat E. et al, complications for CSV were evaluated. Nerve damage was found to be less in the CAC group compared to RFA and EVLA, and hyperpigmentation was more common in the EVLA group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In another study by Bontinis et al, CAC displayed a decreased risk of post-procedural paresthesia and pigmentation, and induration compared with EVLA. 21, 22 In a study by Kubat E. et al, complications for CSV were evaluated. Nerve damage was found to be less in the CAC group compared to RFA and EVLA, and hyperpigmentation was more common in the EVLA group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,36 Namely, findings from a recently published network meta-analysis comparing EVTA and NTNT ablation displayed a trend towards the superiority of EVTA (regarding occlusion success) when ablating larger GSV. 37 Considering the extensive use of endothermal ablation techniques and their well-known advantages over traditional surgery, the scarcity of high-quality data regarding the efficacy of EVTA in ablating large GSVs, came as a surprise to the authors of this review. Since the first publication on this subject dating back to the early 2000s, in a span of 20 years our research has failed to identify any randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of large GSVs (even GSVs over 10 mm) on EVTA outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%