2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Network of Topographic Maps in Human Association Cortex Hierarchically Transforms Visual Timing-Selective Responses

Abstract: Highlights d Many brain areas show neural responses to specific ranges of visual event timing d Timing preferences change gradually in these areas, forming topographic timing maps d Neural response properties hierarchically transform from visual to premotor areas d Timing, numerosity, and visual field map networks are distinct but largely overlap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
125
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
13
125
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have pointed to a broad network of neural regions engaged in temporal processing, including the supplementary motor area, inferior frontal gyrus, cerebellum, and basal ganglia ( Wiener et al, 2010b ; Hayashi et al, 2014 , 2018 ; Protopapa et al, 2019 ; Harvey et al, 2020 ). Although the ROI approach used here was designed to focus on right SMG, it is noteworthy that none of these cortical or subcortical areas showed duration-selective attenuation of the BOLD response in the exploratory, whole-brain analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have pointed to a broad network of neural regions engaged in temporal processing, including the supplementary motor area, inferior frontal gyrus, cerebellum, and basal ganglia ( Wiener et al, 2010b ; Hayashi et al, 2014 , 2018 ; Protopapa et al, 2019 ; Harvey et al, 2020 ). Although the ROI approach used here was designed to focus on right SMG, it is noteworthy that none of these cortical or subcortical areas showed duration-selective attenuation of the BOLD response in the exploratory, whole-brain analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population receptive field (pRF) mapping technique (Dumoulin and Wandell, 2008) has rapidly become a popular method in human neuroimaging, allowing a relatively fast characterization of the retinotopic organization of the brain. Furthermore, since it describes the tuning properties of the underlying voxels, it can also provide insight into more complex visual and cognitive functions (Binda et al, 2018;Ekman et al, 2020;Harvey et al, 2020Harvey et al, , 2015He et al, 2019;Hughes et al, 2019;Mo et al, 2017;Poltoratski et al, 2019;Poltoratski and Tong, 2020;Shao et al, 2013;Shen et al, 2020;Silson et al, 2018;Stoll et al, 2020;Thomas et al, 2015;Welbourne et al, 2018;Zuiderbaan et al, 2017), dysfunctions (Ahmadi et al, 2020;Alvarez et al, 2020;Best et al, 2019;Dumoulin and Knapen, 2018;Green et al, 2019;Schwarzkopf et al, 2014), brain development (Dekker et al, 2019), cortical evolution (Zhu and Vanduffel, 2019), and information transfer across different brain areas (Haak et al, 2013). Human pRFs from neuroimaging studies qualitatively resemble receptive fields recorded with invasive electrophysiological techniques in animal experiments, but since these signals are derived from different species, often with different analytical or experimental methods, it remains an important question what type of neuronal population characteristic is actually measured by the fMRI BOLD-signal (Dumoulin and Wandell, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 'population receptive field' method (Dumoulin and Wandell, 2008;Wandell et al, 2007;Winawer, 2015, 2010) has rapidly become a popular method to map the functional organization of the human brain. In addition to describing the retinotopic organization of retinal activation in cortical and subcortical brain areas, the method has been used to map the cortical representation of other stimulus features such as tonotopy (Thomas et al, 2015), numerosity (Harvey et al, 2015), tactile sensations (Puckett et al, 2020), and visual timing (Harvey et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models of timing judgments for visual events build on evidence showing that V1 neurons respond quasi-linearly to stimuli as a function of their duration 40,41 . The increased magnitude of the response would lead to a shift in the perceived duration in higher-level cortical areas that turn early visual responses into temporal tuning curves that could be used in timing and duration tasks [42][43][44] .…”
Section: Temporal Dilation Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%