“…The population receptive field (pRF) mapping technique (Dumoulin and Wandell, 2008) has rapidly become a popular method in human neuroimaging, allowing a relatively fast characterization of the retinotopic organization of the brain. Furthermore, since it describes the tuning properties of the underlying voxels, it can also provide insight into more complex visual and cognitive functions (Binda et al, 2018;Ekman et al, 2020;Harvey et al, 2020Harvey et al, , 2015He et al, 2019;Hughes et al, 2019;Mo et al, 2017;Poltoratski et al, 2019;Poltoratski and Tong, 2020;Shao et al, 2013;Shen et al, 2020;Silson et al, 2018;Stoll et al, 2020;Thomas et al, 2015;Welbourne et al, 2018;Zuiderbaan et al, 2017), dysfunctions (Ahmadi et al, 2020;Alvarez et al, 2020;Best et al, 2019;Dumoulin and Knapen, 2018;Green et al, 2019;Schwarzkopf et al, 2014), brain development (Dekker et al, 2019), cortical evolution (Zhu and Vanduffel, 2019), and information transfer across different brain areas (Haak et al, 2013). Human pRFs from neuroimaging studies qualitatively resemble receptive fields recorded with invasive electrophysiological techniques in animal experiments, but since these signals are derived from different species, often with different analytical or experimental methods, it remains an important question what type of neuronal population characteristic is actually measured by the fMRI BOLD-signal (Dumoulin and Wandell, 2008).…”