2016
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A network property necessary for concentration robustness

Abstract: Maintenance of functionality of complex cellular networks and entire organisms exposed to environmental perturbations often depends on concentration robustness of the underlying components. Yet, the reasons and consequences of concentration robustness in large-scale cellular networks remain largely unknown. Here, we derive a necessary condition for concentration robustness based only on the structure of networks endowed with mass action kinetics. The structural condition can be used to design targeted experime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robustness may be generally defined [8,12,16] as a system-level dynamical property that allows a system to sustain its functions despite changes in internal and external conditions. This feature, in fact, is fundamental and ubiquitous in biological processes, including cellular networks and entire organisms [2,8,12,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robustness may be generally defined [8,12,16] as a system-level dynamical property that allows a system to sustain its functions despite changes in internal and external conditions. This feature, in fact, is fundamental and ubiquitous in biological processes, including cellular networks and entire organisms [2,8,12,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Eloundou‐Mbebi et al. ), it is unlikely for carotenoid‐producing networks in birds, given the ancient origin and extraordinary conservation of these networks throughout metazoan evolution. Instead, we suggest that the key structural property of carotenoid networks—biochemical pathway redundancy—allowed for continuity of evolutionary processes operating at vastly different time scales in the species diversifying on this network, empirically illustrating that both robustness and evolvability are necessary conditions for continuous evolution (Maynard Smith ; Gavrilets ; Wagner ; Badyaev ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is tempting to speculate that biochemical pathway redundancy, or more generally, the structure of a metabolic network, evolves as a consequence of the most repeatable or efficient flux, when consistent functional priming within generation results in structural redundancy of primed compounds on evolutionary scales. Although this explanation is routinely advanced for evolution of metabolic networks in other systems (Stelling et al 2002;Almaas et al 2005;Ciliberti et al 2007;Kim et al 2007;Basler et al 2016;Eloundou-Mbebi et al 2016), it is unlikely for carotenoidproducing networks in birds, given the ancient origin and extraordinary conservation of these networks throughout metazoan evolution. Instead, we suggest that the key structural property of carotenoid networks-biochemical pathway redundancyallowed for continuity of evolutionary processes operating at vastly different time scales in the species diversifying on this network, empirically illustrating that both robustness and evolvability are necessary conditions for continuous evolution (Maynard Smith 1970;Gavrilets 2004;Wagner 2005;Badyaev 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this scenario, the structure of a metabolic network determines functional properties of metabolism and thus evolves for a specific distribution of flux among compounds (Fig. a; Wagner, ; Eloundou‐Mbebi et al ., ). Adaptive changes in the relative concentrations of compounds produced by metabolic networks would therefore be dependent on the evolution of different network structures, caused by variation in the occurrence of substrate compounds that cannot be metabolically derived (Borenstein et al ., ; Kreimer et al ., ), or the evolution of novel enzymatic reactions and loss of existing reactions (Wagner, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%