NOMS 2018 - 2018 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium 2018
DOI: 10.1109/noms.2018.8406252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A network traffic flow prediction with deep learning approach for large-scale metropolitan area network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithms correctness and completeness were proven, and their complexities were analyzed. An interesting juxtaposition can be done with our model and a proposed approach applied to a real-case big network of Wang et al (2018), that applies a deep learning perspective to a connected traffic flow prediction. While the traffic flow prediction smartly intertwines efficient learning algorithms, the un-distributed network still has a high latency and overhead in comparison with our distributed network model, that needs less data to discover important features and breaches of them in the network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithms correctness and completeness were proven, and their complexities were analyzed. An interesting juxtaposition can be done with our model and a proposed approach applied to a real-case big network of Wang et al (2018), that applies a deep learning perspective to a connected traffic flow prediction. While the traffic flow prediction smartly intertwines efficient learning algorithms, the un-distributed network still has a high latency and overhead in comparison with our distributed network model, that needs less data to discover important features and breaches of them in the network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies [7]- [9] investigated machine learningbased traffic prediction for realizing proactive control. The authors in [7] utilized artificial neural networks, while those in [8] utilized deep learning, which is a type of neural network. However, a neural network-based computational process generally requires a large amount of training data and its learning procedure is time consuming owing to its complex learning model.…”
Section: Resource Adjustmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [7]- [14] investigate machine-learning based traffic prediction for realizing proactive control. The authors in [7], [10], [12] utilize artificial neural networks, while those in [8], [11] utilize deep learning. However, its model is so complicated, and thus, makes it difficult for humans to perform posterior analysis after learning processes.…”
Section: Network Traffic Prediction Using Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the study in [6] proposes a cognitive management framework with unsupervised deep learning and probabilistic generative models for network optimization. The paper in [7] proposes a prediction model with deep learning for internet traffic flow forecast in real-time. To build Self Organizing Networks (SONs), the paper in [8] leverages cellular mobile data to cluster the Base Stations (BSs) using unsupervised learning approaches so that inter-cluster handover rates can be reduced.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%