2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neural ensemble correlation code for sound category identification

Abstract: Humans and other animals effortlessly identify natural sounds and categorize them into behaviorally relevant categories. Yet, the acoustic features and neural transformations that enable sound recognition and the formation of perceptual categories are largely unknown. Here, using multichannel neural recordings in the auditory midbrain of unanesthetized female rabbits, we first demonstrate that neural ensemble activity in the auditory midbrain displays highly structured correlations that vary with distinct natu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where and how the brain represents summary statistics in neural activity and how these contributes to recognition and discrimination for real world sounds is largely unknown. Neural activity throughout the auditory pathway is known to be modulated by a variety of statistical cues such as the sound contrast, modulation power spectrum, and correlation structure [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] . However, it has been less clear whether and to what degree summary statistics serve as informative stimulus dimensions that directly contribute to sound recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where and how the brain represents summary statistics in neural activity and how these contributes to recognition and discrimination for real world sounds is largely unknown. Neural activity throughout the auditory pathway is known to be modulated by a variety of statistical cues such as the sound contrast, modulation power spectrum, and correlation structure [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] . However, it has been less clear whether and to what degree summary statistics serve as informative stimulus dimensions that directly contribute to sound recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurons in the IC are selective over most of the perceptually relevant range of sound modulations and neural activity is strongly driven by multiple high-order sound statistics [4][5][6][7]10 . In previous work, we showed the correlation statistics of natural sounds are highly informative about stimulus identity and they appear to be represented in the correlation statistics of auditory midbrain neuron ensembles 4 . Correlations between neurons have also been proposed as mechanisms for pitch identification 13 and sound localization 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine how natural sound statistics influence the response statistics of neural ensembles in IC, we first characterized several key statistics from an auditory model representation for five natural sound recordings. These include sounds from a crackling fire, bird chorus, outdoor crowd, running water, and a rattling snake (Supplementary sounds [1][2][3][4][5]. We then used texture synthesis 1 to generate synthetic sound variants with perturbed low-and high-order statistics (see METHODS).…”
Section: Natural Sound Texture Statistics Modulate Neural Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the contribution of nonspecific neural activity, we also estimated noise correlations, which are the result of stimulus-independent network activity. The noise correlations were obtained by subtracting the shuffled (different trials) from the unshuffled (same trials) crosscorrelations 4 . Similar to the shuffled correlation, the unshuffled correlation between recording channels k and l was given as: where c *7 0R:8@ 1, < is also bounded between -1 and 1.…”
Section: Population Response Metrics: Neural Correlations and Neural mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation