Proceedings IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2003)
DOI: 10.1109/wi.2003.1241300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neural network based approach to automated e-mail classification

Abstract: In

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of spam filtering techniques is determined by two well-known measures used in text classification. These measures are precision and recall [24,25]. Here four metric have been used for evaluating the performance of proposed method such as precision, accuracy, recall and F1 score.…”
Section: Results Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of spam filtering techniques is determined by two well-known measures used in text classification. These measures are precision and recall [24,25]. Here four metric have been used for evaluating the performance of proposed method such as precision, accuracy, recall and F1 score.…”
Section: Results Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then SVM separates spam and ham by a maximummargin hyperplane (a hyperplane with the largest distance to the nearest data points in both classes). Other well-known supervised learning paradigms include neural networks [8], maximum entropy models [51], and RuleFit (used by the SNARE system [16]). …”
Section: Supervised Learning In Traditional Spam Filtering Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FPR and FNR according to statistics in SA vary between 0.06-0.70% and 1.49-7.63%, respectively [35]. 8 We query six public blacklists, and an email is classified as spam if its IP is blocked by at least 2 DNSBLs.…”
Section: The Visibility Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are existing spam filtering methods, such as SVM [1]、naive Bayesian 、K-Nearest Neighborhood [2] and other text classification methods can be effective to achieve the spam detection and filtering function. But for the characteristics of variation of the mail or the emergence of new features are often unable to find and extract the characteristics of the mail, and the information is not interactive timely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%