2006
DOI: 10.1080/01431160500421507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neural network integrated approach for rice crop monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many rice mapping techniques have been developed and utilization of temporal information has been a successful approach. For rice applications, microwave observations at the relevant configuration are sensitive to growth stages, biomass development, plant height, leaf-ground double bounce, soil moisture, and inundation frequency and duration [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. During rice transplanting periods, the surface contribution of a rice paddy causes low backscatter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many rice mapping techniques have been developed and utilization of temporal information has been a successful approach. For rice applications, microwave observations at the relevant configuration are sensitive to growth stages, biomass development, plant height, leaf-ground double bounce, soil moisture, and inundation frequency and duration [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. During rice transplanting periods, the surface contribution of a rice paddy causes low backscatter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic methodology adopted was to use artificial neural networks as the predictors on a pixel by pixel basis, with the satellite image data as input variables. Neural networks were chosen because they have proven particularly effective in integrating multiple types of spatial data in the past 19 , including in agricultural applications [20][21][22][23] , and because they can easily be adapted to handle a large number of input variables, as required in a multi-temporal context and with large numbers of channels 24 (for example with hyperspectral imagery 25 ) or with combinations of multispectral imagery and multi-polarization imagery as required in this particular application.…”
Section: Yield Prediction Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above reasoning provides the foundation for using AGB to approximate yield through three major sources: (i) an optical data derived vegetation index (e.g., normalized difference vegetation index [NDVI], enhanced vegetation index [EVI]) (Chang, Shen, and Lo 2005;Patel et al 1991, Son et al 2013; (ii) microwave-based backscatters (mostly C-band in previous studies) (Chen and Mcnairn 2006;Inoue, Sakaiya, and Wang 2014a;Kurosu and Chiba 1995); or (iii) calculations based on net primary production using light-use efficiency (Peng et al 2014, Savin andIsaev 2011). Meanwhile, it is important to clarify that AGB does not explain all the variation in yield, and harvest index has to be separately modeled and incorporated in the yield modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%