2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11571-015-9329-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neural network model of reliably optimized spike transmission

Abstract: We studied the detailed structure of a neuronal network model in which the spontaneous spike activity is correctly optimized to match the experimental data and discuss the reliability of the optimized spike transmission. Two stochastic properties of the spontaneous activity were calculated: the spike-count rate and synchrony size. The synchrony size, expected to be an important factor for optimization of spike transmission in the network, represents a percentage of observed coactive neurons within a time bin, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6(b)]. It is known that local interactions between excitatory and inhibitory neurons induce neural oscillations with high coherence between excitatory and inhibitory neural populations [72]- [76], and the size of this synchronized neural population is expanded under strong EPSP connections [29]. Therefore, it can be interpreted that the activated state of one module corresponded to the oscillation induced by intramodule connections between excitatory and inhibitory neural populations and the existence of strong EPSP connections, whereas the deactivated state of the other module represented subserviently spiking activity driven by the external input spikes and spikes from other modules.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6(b)]. It is known that local interactions between excitatory and inhibitory neurons induce neural oscillations with high coherence between excitatory and inhibitory neural populations [72]- [76], and the size of this synchronized neural population is expanded under strong EPSP connections [29]. Therefore, it can be interpreted that the activated state of one module corresponded to the oscillation induced by intramodule connections between excitatory and inhibitory neural populations and the existence of strong EPSP connections, whereas the deactivated state of the other module represented subserviently spiking activity driven by the external input spikes and spikes from other modules.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) Surrogate Data Analysis: Recent findings regarding temporal fluctuations of neural activity imply that the structural network characteristics induce complex temporal neural fluctuation [20], [29]- [33]. Moreover, we previously reported that this characteristic appears as the deterministic dynamical activity, instead of stochastic temporal behavior [33].…”
Section: B Evaluation Index 1) Spiking Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(6, 7, 8). Izhikevich's neuron model is widely used in many studies (Qu et al 2014;Samura et al 2015;Li et al 2016;Zhao et al 2016. Three spiking patterns were used: regular spiking (RS), chattering (CH), and low-threshold spiking (LTS), as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Neuron Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these issues, Hodgkin and Huxley (1952) proposed the Hodgkin-Huxley model. Not only did the model parameters have biological significance and scalability (Samura et al 2015), but the model also provided a foundation from which to explore synaptic integration and interactions between ion currents. However, its computational efficiency was poor, and it could only simulate a few neurons in real-time (Izhikevich 2003).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%