2020
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2019.2949926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New 3-D Minimum Cost Flow Phase Unwrapping Algorithm Based on Closure Phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Goldstein's branch-cut (Goldstein) algorithm (Yu et al, 2019) is the most representative of the residue-theorembased methods, connecting the nearby positive and negative residues so that the residues are balanced. The minimum cost flow (MCF) PU method (Costantini, 1998;Liu and Pan, 2020) and Flynn's minimum discontinuity (MD) method (Xu et al, 2016) can be classified as the LP-norm phase unwrapping method. Quality-guided (QD) phase unwrapping method assumes that pixels with high quality are less likely to cause PU error (Yu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Phase Unwrapping For the Clear Interferometric Fringesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Goldstein's branch-cut (Goldstein) algorithm (Yu et al, 2019) is the most representative of the residue-theorembased methods, connecting the nearby positive and negative residues so that the residues are balanced. The minimum cost flow (MCF) PU method (Costantini, 1998;Liu and Pan, 2020) and Flynn's minimum discontinuity (MD) method (Xu et al, 2016) can be classified as the LP-norm phase unwrapping method. Quality-guided (QD) phase unwrapping method assumes that pixels with high quality are less likely to cause PU error (Yu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Phase Unwrapping For the Clear Interferometric Fringesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase unwrapping is an important factor affecting the accuracy of InSAR measurement (Wang et al, 2017). Although many methods for InSAR phase unwrapping have been proposed (Chiglia and Pritt, 1998;Costantini, 1998;Xu et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2019;Luo et al, 2020;Liu and Pan, 2020;Zhou et al, 2020;Sica et al, 2020;Dai et al, 2020;Gao et al, 2020), traditional methods cannot unwrap the interferometric phase correctly and the reliability of InSAR monitoring results is not high in monitoring the large deformation in the mining areas. There are several learning-based phase unwrapping methods, including back-projection neural network in 1D phase unwrapping (Tipper et al, 1996;Hamzah et al, 1997), supervised feedforward multilayer perceptron neural network for 2D phase unwrapping (Schwartzkopf et al, 2000), a deep learning-based phase unwrapping network that uses the fully convolutional network (FCN) (Spoorthi et al, 2019), and also a deep convolutional neural networkbased robust phase gradient estimation for 2D phase unwrapping (Li et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costantini et al formulated the 3-D PU in a common framework [24], which includes standard techniques and constraints from external information if available. Liu et al established a mathematical constraint within the closure phases and unwrapped sparse 3-D grids jointly [25]. However, these methods are sensitive to deformation or atmospheric signal of long time series and sudden changes of residual topography for low density grid, which results in that the phase continuity assumption is not valid any more.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, these methods are at the cost of spatial resolution due to the straightforward rectangular estimation window [9]. Additionally, the multilooking process or nonlinear filtering approach may invalidate the phase consistency hypothesis [10], which is also called phase triangularity [11]. However, most coherence models for SAR interferometry purposes implicitly assume phase consistency; otherwise, this would challenge any simple interpretation of the interferometric phase [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%