2006 American Control Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2006.1657361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new adaptive control algorithm for systems with multilinear parametrization

Abstract: Adaptive control of nonlinearly parametrized (NLP) systems is an unknown field, where few results have been proposed up to now. In this paper, we propose a new adaptive control algorithm for systems with multilinear parametrization, that belong to the class of nonlinear parametrizations. The proposed controller is a non certainty equivalence one where only the original parameters, without then the need of overparametrization, are adapted. An important feature of the proposed approach is that its convergence pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [24] reparametrization to convexify an otherwise non-convexly parameterized system is proposed. See also [25] and [35] for some interesting results along these lines, where the controller and the estimator switch between over/underbounding convex/concave functions.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24] reparametrization to convexify an otherwise non-convexly parameterized system is proposed. See also [25] and [35] for some interesting results along these lines, where the controller and the estimator switch between over/underbounding convex/concave functions.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Netto et al [2000] reparametrization to convexify an otherwise non-convexly parameterized system is proposed. See also Netto et al [2006] and Tyukin et al [2003] for some recent interesting results along these lines, where the controller and the estimator switch between over/underbounding convex/concave functions. Similarly to the present paper, in Tyukin et al [2007] monotonicity, instead of convexity, is used-but under radically different assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%