2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.104813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new agamid lizard in mid-Cretaceous amber from northern Myanmar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With 374 single-copy orthologous groups identified across the genomes of L. sacra and 49 other species ( Table S6 ), we constructed a maximum-likelihood tree, including time calibrations based on fossil records or inferred divergence time ( Figure 3 ) [ 18 ]. Congruent with previous studies, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis indicated that divergence between Lepidosauria (snakes and lizards) and Archosauromorpha (turtles, crocodilians, and birds) occurred around 270.0 million years ago (Mya) during the Permian period [ 7 ], and the emergence of the common ancestor of Agamidae, to which Laudakia and Pogona belong, was no earlier than the Late Cretaceous ( Figure 3 ) [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…With 374 single-copy orthologous groups identified across the genomes of L. sacra and 49 other species ( Table S6 ), we constructed a maximum-likelihood tree, including time calibrations based on fossil records or inferred divergence time ( Figure 3 ) [ 18 ]. Congruent with previous studies, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis indicated that divergence between Lepidosauria (snakes and lizards) and Archosauromorpha (turtles, crocodilians, and birds) occurred around 270.0 million years ago (Mya) during the Permian period [ 7 ], and the emergence of the common ancestor of Agamidae, to which Laudakia and Pogona belong, was no earlier than the Late Cretaceous ( Figure 3 ) [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, as far as we could observe and without a taxonomic description, the morphotypes in pieces GRS-Ref-28627, GRS-Ref-28631, and GRS-Ref-060905 are the same or highly similar to those in layers 10 and 12 above described. Empidoidea and Phoridae, around the fossils of agamid lizards 41 , are observed in the pieces GRS-Ref-28631 (Fig. 5 ) and GRS-Ref-060905 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 ). Protodraco monocoli Wagner et al 16 is an isolated limb, but differs from Retinosaurus in having finer scalation. Allowing for immaturity, Retinosaurus also differs from other roughly contemporaneous fossil squamates known from Europe, Asia, and the Americas in the following combination of characters: depressed (box-shaped) skull; nasal process of unpaired premaxilla long, almost reaching frontals; anterior width of nasals exceeds nasofrontal joint width; elongate frontal plate only weakly emarginated by orbits (contra Eichstaettisaurus Kuhn 34 , Liushusaurus Evans and Wang 35 , Meyasaurus Vidal 36 , Huehuecuetzpalli Reynoso 37 ); anteriorly well-developed subolfactory processes that extend toward the ventral midline; interdigitated fronto-parietal suture (as in Yabeinosaurus Endo and Shikama 38 , Sakurasaurus Evans and Manabe 39 , but contra Huehuecuetzpalli , Tepexisaurus and extant xantusiids), with parietal tabs underlying frontals; paired parietals lacking ventral fossa for supraoccipital processus ascendens (contra Yabeinosaurus, Sakurasaurus, Kuroyuriella Evans and Matsumoto 40 , Hoyalacerta Evans and Barbadillo 41 , Dorsetisaurus Hoffstetter 42 , Purbicella Evans et al .…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the skeletons of these lizards are often delicate and the global gekkotan fossil record is relatively poor, making the Myanmar amber deposits particularly significant for this clade 11 , 12 . Other lineages—including iguanians—may also be represented from these deposits 12 , 16 , 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%