2016
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20168002004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new algorithm for dense ellipse packing and polygonal structures generation in context of FEM or DEM

Abstract: Abstract.A new constructive ellipse packing algorithm is presented. It allows to respect the imposed area, shape and spatial orientation distribution (i.e. the inertia tensor) and achieve high packing densities. The packing density decreases with increasing particles aspect ratio what is in agreement with results reported in the literature. The generated packings with complex imposed area, shape and spatial orientation distributions with densities in the range of 0.74 and 0.8 are presented. The efficiency of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the typical value of the packing fraction of the randomly jammed ellipsoidal particles, computer modeling was performed using a FORTRAN program based on a nonlinear mathematical programming model . It should be emphasized that in the last decade, several theoretical works have been carried out to study the packing behavior of nonspherical objects. ,,,, The work based on mathematical modeling reported by Birgin et al deals with the 3D packing of a given set of nonoverlapping identical ellipsoids inside a sphere of minimum possible volume. The algorithm of the numerical model consists of the following steps: Generation of “ m ” number of identical ellipsoids with predefined semimajor and semiminor axis inside a container (a sphere in this case). The center of the ellipsoids should be distributed in such a way that the interiors of the ellipsoids are mutually disjoint to ensure the nonoverlapping of the ellipsoids. All the ellipsoids must be inside the container at any given point of time. All the translation and rotational motions of the ellipsoids should satisfy the criteria of (ii) and (iii). Finally, the container volume with respect to the motion of the ellipsoids should be minimized. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the typical value of the packing fraction of the randomly jammed ellipsoidal particles, computer modeling was performed using a FORTRAN program based on a nonlinear mathematical programming model . It should be emphasized that in the last decade, several theoretical works have been carried out to study the packing behavior of nonspherical objects. ,,,, The work based on mathematical modeling reported by Birgin et al deals with the 3D packing of a given set of nonoverlapping identical ellipsoids inside a sphere of minimum possible volume. The algorithm of the numerical model consists of the following steps: Generation of “ m ” number of identical ellipsoids with predefined semimajor and semiminor axis inside a container (a sphere in this case). The center of the ellipsoids should be distributed in such a way that the interiors of the ellipsoids are mutually disjoint to ensure the nonoverlapping of the ellipsoids. All the ellipsoids must be inside the container at any given point of time. All the translation and rotational motions of the ellipsoids should satisfy the criteria of (ii) and (iii). Finally, the container volume with respect to the motion of the ellipsoids should be minimized. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is to provide examples where one can observe the significant differences Fig. 25 The location of the contact points x c is the same for both the MDP and MPP pairs c associated with the MDP belongs to the intersection of both ellipses. However, the MPP produces a reasonable contact point y c inside the intersection between both ellipses E i ∩ E j .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given our intended applications, this study will omit discussing contact detection between particles not defined analytically by an ellipse and will also ignore contact detection for rapidly moving pairs of ellipses. In particular, we are not interested by the contact detection problem when the ellipse is approximated by segments of circles [ 25 , 28 , 37 , 49 ], by grid or polar representation of particles [ 24 ], by the four arc approximation of ellipses [ 28 , 49 ], as a polyhedral surface [ 17 ], or in the most general form as a combination of NURBS [ 30 , 48 ]. The analysis is also limited to soft particles, that is to pairs of ellipses for which an accurate estimate of the separation/penetration distance is required, usually to compute forces between particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This class of methods can be primarily divided into dynamic and constructive solutions. In the dynamic approaches, the spheres change their position or their size during the packing process, which is controlled by a shrinking algorithm (Tory & Jodrey, 1986;Torquato & Jiao, 2010;He et al, 2018), compression forces algorithm (Khirevich, et al, 2013;Baranau & Tallarek, 2014) or gravitational algorithm (Shi & Zhang, 2008;Hitti & Bernacki, 2013;Sahu, 2009;Ilina & Bernacki, 2016). In the case of constructive approaches, sphere parameters like size or position are preserved during the packing process, so they are less costly but have difficulties in achieving high-density packing (Evans, 1993;Cui & O'Sullivan, 2003;Kazakov et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%