1998
DOI: 10.1177/00030651980460041001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Analytic Dyad: Homosexual Analyst, Heterosexual Patient

Abstract: The paradoxical thesis is presented that the extraordinary aspect of the analytic experience of a homosexual male analyst and his heterosexual male analysand is that it was ordinary, that the fundamental processes of transference, countertransference, and analysis of defense and resistance were determinative. The unique variations of these processes with this particular patient are explored. The patient entered treatment unaware of the analyst's homosexuality, which he discovered during the analysis. The cours… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Writing on the fringes of mainstream psychoanalytic thinking throughout the 1980s and 90s, American psychoanalytic writers such as Isay (1985), Phillips (1998), Drescher (2002), and Lewes (2005) were pioneers in challenging psychoanalytic thinking on homosexuality. For example, Isay challenged the mainstream pathological language at the time and called for therapeutic neutrality towards gay patients that present for treatment:
My experience suggests that the usual analytic attitude of positive regards and neutrality may be enormously, perhaps especially, helpful to any patient who has internalised the critical, deprecatory attitudes of a prejudiced society by helping him to acquire a more positive, accepting image of himself.
…”
Section: Same‐sex Desirementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Writing on the fringes of mainstream psychoanalytic thinking throughout the 1980s and 90s, American psychoanalytic writers such as Isay (1985), Phillips (1998), Drescher (2002), and Lewes (2005) were pioneers in challenging psychoanalytic thinking on homosexuality. For example, Isay challenged the mainstream pathological language at the time and called for therapeutic neutrality towards gay patients that present for treatment:
My experience suggests that the usual analytic attitude of positive regards and neutrality may be enormously, perhaps especially, helpful to any patient who has internalised the critical, deprecatory attitudes of a prejudiced society by helping him to acquire a more positive, accepting image of himself.
…”
Section: Same‐sex Desirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Isay challenged the mainstream pathological language at the time and called for therapeutic neutrality towards gay patients that present for treatment:
My experience suggests that the usual analytic attitude of positive regards and neutrality may be enormously, perhaps especially, helpful to any patient who has internalised the critical, deprecatory attitudes of a prejudiced society by helping him to acquire a more positive, accepting image of himself. (Isay, 1985, p. 251)
Phillips’ (1998) illuminating paper explored the transferential implications of when patients learn of their analyst's homosexuality. He argued that the discovery was not an impediment to the analytic process, but rather a powerful vehicle for exploring the patient's fantasies and defences in the transference.…”
Section: Same‐sex Desirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sidney Phillips (1998) wrote about the gay analyst working with a heterosexual patient: he presented a case of a heterosexual man who learned of the analyst's homosexual orientation inadvertently through extraanalytic sources of information. Phillips underscored the usual analytic task of helping the patient understand the meanings of any information about the analyst, be it race, gender, age, marital status, or any other personal data.…”
Section: Transference and The Homosexual Analystmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This imposition of gendered requirements is troublesome, especially as the gender binary is everywhere implicit in APsaA’s approach. As is true for sexuality (Phillips 1998), focusing on the binary gender of the analyst and the gender of a particular patient is a radical reduction that runs counter to the analyst’s attempt to foster a process in which “the broadest range of unconscious meanings can enter into experience” (LaFarge 2014, p. 1269). According to Grossman and Kaplan (1988), all similarities and differences—in age, ability, race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status—“are invested with intense feeling by all people” (p. 352).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%