2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6nr03386e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new angle on dynamic depolarized light scattering: number-averaged size distribution of nanoparticles in focus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Smoluchowski approximation was fitted to 10 cycles of electrophoretic mobility (EPM) measurement and 10 measurements were obtained for each sample to estimate the mean and standard deviation (SD). Hydrodynamic radii were measured by depolarized dynamic light scattering (DDLS) and the values have been provided as intensity-weighted size distributions as previously reported by Geers et al [11]. Briefly, samples were diluted into CCM and measurements were carried out at 37 • C with a scattering angle of 30 • .…”
Section: Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Smoluchowski approximation was fitted to 10 cycles of electrophoretic mobility (EPM) measurement and 10 measurements were obtained for each sample to estimate the mean and standard deviation (SD). Hydrodynamic radii were measured by depolarized dynamic light scattering (DDLS) and the values have been provided as intensity-weighted size distributions as previously reported by Geers et al [11]. Briefly, samples were diluted into CCM and measurements were carried out at 37 • C with a scattering angle of 30 • .…”
Section: Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) is dependent on P(r); hence, fitting an analytic function requires a parametric model distribution that adequately describes the true particle size distribution. While models are practical in certain situations (Geers et al 2016;Rodriguez-Lorenzo et al 2016), they are not always available or represent real scenarios, and thus the true shape of P(r) frequently remains unknown. To circumvent this limitation, we apply here a more general, model-independent, and accurate non-parametric description.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the area of detection in LIT is not limited to a small sample volume fraction, the method is nonintrusive and the sample can be recovered after the analysis. Considering that only the light absorbed by the NPs is converted into heat differentiates LIT from light‐scattering techniques, as the main advantage of LIT relies on the flexibility to adapt the applied trigger signal to match with the plasmonic resonance of the NPs. In addition, only very low amounts of sample material (40 µL per sample were used in this study) are needed to perform a LIT measurement, representing an advantage over common UV‐Vis spectroscopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%