2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2018.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new application of NMR in characterization of multiphase methane and adsorption capacity of shale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
107
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 2, there are three distinct peaks for the samples: the left peak (P1) centered at 0.1-10 ms, the middle peak (P2) at approximately 10-100 ms, and the right peak (P3) at > 100 ms. The configurations of the T 2 spectra distributions represent the pore size distribution, with smaller pores having a shorter relaxation time, and a longer relaxation time for larger pores (Yao et al, 2019). Generally, the P3 peaks represent the bulk water content in the corner and surface of the samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 2, there are three distinct peaks for the samples: the left peak (P1) centered at 0.1-10 ms, the middle peak (P2) at approximately 10-100 ms, and the right peak (P3) at > 100 ms. The configurations of the T 2 spectra distributions represent the pore size distribution, with smaller pores having a shorter relaxation time, and a longer relaxation time for larger pores (Yao et al, 2019). Generally, the P3 peaks represent the bulk water content in the corner and surface of the samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct observation methods are, for example, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [5,6], X-ray computerized tomography (X-CT) [7,8] and atomic force microscope (AFM) [9,10], which can be used 2 of 18 to characterize the two-or three-dimensional distribution of coal PSDs. Indirectly inferred methods include mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) [11,12], gas adsorption (N 2 and CO 2 ) [13][14][15][16] and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [17][18][19]. Among of these methods, MIP measurement has been proven as an effective method to estimate the PSD of coals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deviations between their method and traditional volumetric method are in range of 0.50%-11.09%. Then, Yao et al [50] improved the low-field NMR method by taking a factor "pipeline volume" into consideration and applied it to calculate the adsorbed methane volume in two shale samples. The calculated adsorbed methane volumes fit well with values from the gravimetric method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an organic rock, the pore property (i.e., types, structure, and pore size distribution) of coal is different to that of shale rock which would influence the gas adsorption performance in reservoirs. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the suitability of this modified low-field NMR method [50] on a coal sample and the influence of the coal rank on the results from this method have never been discussed. In this study,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%