2011
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2010.2051823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Approach for Nontechnical Losses Detection Based on Optimum-Path Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
52
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Ramos et al, 2010) a new approach, Optimum Path Forest (OPF), is applied to fraud detection in electricity consumption. The work shows good results in a problem similar to the targeted.…”
Section: Opfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (Ramos et al, 2010) a new approach, Optimum Path Forest (OPF), is applied to fraud detection in electricity consumption. The work shows good results in a problem similar to the targeted.…”
Section: Opfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in pattern classification field has been made to tackle this problem (Ramos et al, 2010), (Nagi and Mohamad, 2010), (Muniz et al, 2009), (Jiang et al, 2000) In Uruguay the national electric power company (henceforth call UTE) faces the problem by manually monitoring a group of customers. A group of experts looks at the monthly consumption curve of each customer and indicates those with some kind of suspicious behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. W. S. dos Angelos [8] presented a cluster-based classification strategy with an unsupervised algorithm of two steps to identify suspected profiles of power consumption, providing a good assertiveness in real life systems. Over the past years, other studies in this field have been addressed applying different computational techniques to improve the detection of non-technical losses [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimum-path forest classifier is a graph-based technique that is less common in the literature and is reported as outperforming SVM and ANN in [51,52].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%