2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1777-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to assess movements and isometric postures of spine and trunk at the workplace

Abstract: Low back pain is regarded as the primary cause of occupational disability in many countries worldwide. However, there is a lack of valid assessment of kinematic spine and trunk parameters to provide further insight into occupational spine loads. A new 3-dimensional mobile measurement system (3D-SpineMoveGuard) was developed and evaluated by means of repeated dynamic and isometric trunk positions by 10 male and 10 female volunteers. The interclass correlation coefficient indicates high test-retest reliability (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More novel devices are now often portable and thus offer the possibility to collect dynamic changes in upper body movements. Here, the collection of data using the 3D-SpineMoveGuard [9] and inertial measurement units [10], which are based on single sensors attached to the skin, are practicable but do not allow conclusions to be drawn on spinal shape. Other measurement tools such as the CA-6000 [11], fiber-optic sensors [12] and the lumbar motion monitor [13] are not suitable for assessing the conditions during normal activities of daily living due to their bulky construction or not being portable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More novel devices are now often portable and thus offer the possibility to collect dynamic changes in upper body movements. Here, the collection of data using the 3D-SpineMoveGuard [9] and inertial measurement units [10], which are based on single sensors attached to the skin, are practicable but do not allow conclusions to be drawn on spinal shape. Other measurement tools such as the CA-6000 [11], fiber-optic sensors [12] and the lumbar motion monitor [13] are not suitable for assessing the conditions during normal activities of daily living due to their bulky construction or not being portable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that results from triaxial accelerometer measurements of trunk flexion and lateral bending could be accurate to within 5 • . Wunderlich et al recently developed a measurement system using an inclinometer and ultrasound measurements to calculate spinal motion in bending and axial twist [16], and they state that there is currently no "gold standard" to assess spine movements, though they mention 3D motion capture systems as a viable option. Ultimately, for this study a 16-camera Vicon MX40 motion analysis system (Vicon, Oxford, UK) was used to track the 3D coordinates of reflective markers placed on the subjects and orthosis.…”
Section: Quantifying Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, several methods have been developed to perform accurate postural evaluations during standing. Technological advancements have enabled the use of highly reliable and easy-tooperate tools, such as X-ray scanners (16,17) and computerized photographic systems (18), to assess postural asymmetry. X-ray imaging is the standard method of assessing spinal alignment because it provides clear images of anatomical landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%