2020
DOI: 10.1177/1081286520972752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to curvature measures in linear shell theories

Abstract: The paper presents a coordinate-free analysis of deformation measures for shells modeled as 2D surfaces. These measures are represented by second-order tensors. As is well-known, two types are needed in general: the surface strain measure (deformations in tangential directions), and the bending strain measure (warping). Our approach first determines the 3D strain tensor E of a shear deformation of a 3D shell-like body and then linearizes E in two smallness parameters: the displacement and the distance of a poi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the assumptions which follow from considering µ c → ∞ are also expressed naturally in terms of 3), see estimate (3.63) and Section 3.2. This line of thought, beside some other arguments presented in the linearised framework by Anicic and Léger [6], see also [3], and more recently by Šilhavỳ [39], suggest that the triple G ∞ , R ∞ − 2 G ∞ L y0 and K ∞ are appropriate measures to express the change of metric and of the curvatures H and K, while the bending and drilling effects are both additionally incorporated in the bending-curvature energy through the elastic shell bending-curvature tensor K ∞ .…”
Section: Strain Measures In the Cosserat Shell Modelmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the assumptions which follow from considering µ c → ∞ are also expressed naturally in terms of 3), see estimate (3.63) and Section 3.2. This line of thought, beside some other arguments presented in the linearised framework by Anicic and Léger [6], see also [3], and more recently by Šilhavỳ [39], suggest that the triple G ∞ , R ∞ − 2 G ∞ L y0 and K ∞ are appropriate measures to express the change of metric and of the curvatures H and K, while the bending and drilling effects are both additionally incorporated in the bending-curvature energy through the elastic shell bending-curvature tensor K ∞ .…”
Section: Strain Measures In the Cosserat Shell Modelmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Since E s = Q T e,s F e,s − 1 3 , this condition is equivalent to: the Biot-type stretch tensor U e,s = Q T e,s F e,s for the 3D shell is symmetric. In conclusion, from (3.27) we see that the tensor (E m,s B y0 + C y0 K e,s ) can be viewed as a bending tensor for shells in the sense of Anicic and Léger [6] and Šilhavỳ [39].…”
Section: D Versus 2d Symmetry Requirements For µ C → ∞mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of this name is justified subsequently in the framework of the linearized theory, see [38,39]. Let us notice that the elastic shell bending-curvature tensor K e,s appearing in the Cosserat Γ-limit is not capable to measure the change of curvature, see [37,38,39,41], and that sometimes a confusion is made between bending and change of curvature measures, see also [1,6,7,10,61] If we ignore the effect of the change of curvature tensor (9.12) in the model obtained via the derivation approach, there exists no coupling terms in E m,s and K e,s and we obtain a particular form of the energy, i.e.,…”
Section: A Comparison With the Nonlinear Derivation Cosserat Shell Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that the surviving Cosserat curvature is not related to the change of curvature tensor, which measures the change of mean curvature and Gauß curvature of the surface, see Acharya[1], Anicic and Legér[10] as well as the recent work by Silhavy[61] and[37,38,39,41]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%