A new approach to data access and research transparency (DART)

Abstract

Recent debates on transparency and replicability suggest that JIBS needs to update its approach on data access and research transparency (DART). We propose a series of initiatives, knowing well that there is a balance to be struck. There are clear benefits on the one hand, chief among these the potential for learning and knowledge accumulation, and equally manifest challenges on the other: the imperative to respect privacy, confidentiality, and intellectual property rights. Without addressing these challenges, will there be the highquality data on which the benefits depend? We present access and transparency objectives, and set out how an actionable and effective approach towards DART will be implemented, but also address ethical, legal, and organizational challenges of concern to us as a scholarly community. Journal of International Business Studies (2020).

The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews

“…Scientific knowledge is the result of a multi-generational collaboration where we cumulatively generate and connect findings gleaned from individual studies (Beugelsdijk, van Witteloostuijn, The online version of this article is available Open Access & Meyer, 2020). Meta-analysis is critical to this process, being the methodology of choice to quantitatively synthesize existing empirical evidence and draw evidence-based recommendations for practice and policymaking (Aguinis, Pierce, Bosco, Dalton, & Dalton, 2011;Davies, Nutley, & Smith, 1999).…”

Dealing with dynamic endogeneity in international business research

“…If there is little change in effect sizes, is it because of low statistical power? JIBS data access and research transparency (DART) guidelines (Beugelsdijk, van Witteloostuijn, & Meyer, 2020) require that this be clearly reported.…”

Tutorial-Articles: The Importance of Data and Code Sharing

“…Accompanying the discussion about code sharing is the need for structured data management protocols (Beugelsdijk et al, 2020). There are two layers where this discussion occurs.…”

“…It is almost 2021, and the discussion about open research data, transparency, credibility, and research funding has been extensive in the past few years in the academic research communities of business and management (Babin, Ortinau, Herrmann, & Lopez, 2020;Beugelsdijk, Van Witteloostuijn, & Meyer, 2020). The list of journals debating and increasing practices related to what is known as open science (OS) grows by the minute and, at the moment, includes Management Science, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Business Research, Strategic Management Journal, Organization Science, Journal of Management, and many others. Lists like this one are not a novelty anymore.…”

“…In times where data is abundant -in marketing (Sheth & Kellstadt, 2020), in finance (Begenau, Farboodi, & Veldkamp, 2018), and in accounting (Bhimani & Willcocks, 2014) -and transparency is key (Beugelsdijk et al, 2020;Mendes-da-Silva, 2019;Mendes-da-Silva & Leal, 2020), articles with open data, open code, and reused data become essential to the research community. All these practices have numerous benefits to researchers (increasing visibility, reputation, and citation), to students (decrease learning efforts and time), and to the general society (increase transparency and decrease the cost of science) (Drachen, Ellegaard, Larsen, & Dorch, 2016;McKiernan et al, 2016;Pampel & Dallmeier-Tiessen, 2014;Piwowar & Vision, 2013).…”