2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60099-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to determine press stiffness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For δ2 = 0.03 mm [18], the tile angle of the slide is α ≈ (δ − δ2)/(l/2) = 4.038 × 10 −4 rad. According to Equation (16), the maximum allowable lateral force acting on the guide rails was calculated, and [Fp] is 1.94 × 10 5 N. Then, the maximum eccentricity, e, in the X direction is 100 mm. According to Equation (13), the eccentric force on the pillar is F1x = 1.83 × 10 5 N < [Fp].…”
Section: The Pillars Optimization In Slide Guide Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For δ2 = 0.03 mm [18], the tile angle of the slide is α ≈ (δ − δ2)/(l/2) = 4.038 × 10 −4 rad. According to Equation (16), the maximum allowable lateral force acting on the guide rails was calculated, and [Fp] is 1.94 × 10 5 N. Then, the maximum eccentricity, e, in the X direction is 100 mm. According to Equation (13), the eccentric force on the pillar is F1x = 1.83 × 10 5 N < [Fp].…”
Section: The Pillars Optimization In Slide Guide Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Arentoft et al proposed a new procedure for measuring press stiffness, including separated horizontal and vertical loading of the press frame. The load can be eccentrically positioned for measuring rotational stiffness [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine compliance parameters under static loads, norms for forming presses have existed since 1988. Arentoft and Wanheim showed one possibility to determine a press stiffness matrix. This serves as an input for simulations and represents the behavior of the forming machine.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For large size machine tool, reduced structural stiffness compared to smaller machine tool is one of problems to be resolved because deflection of a machine structure rises as an exponential function of its dimension while the allowable deflection increases linearly [9]. In the past decades, many researchers have studied machine tool stiffness evaluation methodologies and design optimization for high structural rigidity and lightweight [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Machine tool stiffness evaluation method [3,4] by determining the compliance frequency response function at TCP is a more economical and analytical way than that by a direct cutting test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%