2022
DOI: 10.1111/jmi.13153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to etching low‐carbon microalloyed steels to reveal prior austenite grain boundaries and the dual‐phase microstructure

Abstract: A modification to picric acid solutions has been undertaken to reveal the prior-austenite grain boundaries in microalloyed steels as a result of elemental segregation. It has been found the maximum addition of sodium dodecyl sulphate plus hydrochloric acid to fully reveal both the prior austenite grain boundaries and the final post-processed structures in these steels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis was conducted in the FEI Inspect F50 microscope using a voltage of 20 kV and a step size of 0.1 µm. For the observation of the prior austenite grain boundaries (PAGBs), polished samples prepared following on from other published research [25][26][27], and were etched between 1 and 3 min in a saturated aqueous picric acid solution at 80 • C until PAGBs were revealed, the solution was prepared with 100 mL of distilled water, 1.5 g of Sodium dodecyl sulphate as a surfactant and 5 to 7 drops of HCl. The average grain size and recrystallisation fraction were estimated for each deformation condition using at least 3 OM images, the average grain size was obtained with the linear intercept method (ASTM E-112) whereas the recrystallised fraction was determined with the point counting method.…”
Section: Metallographic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis was conducted in the FEI Inspect F50 microscope using a voltage of 20 kV and a step size of 0.1 µm. For the observation of the prior austenite grain boundaries (PAGBs), polished samples prepared following on from other published research [25][26][27], and were etched between 1 and 3 min in a saturated aqueous picric acid solution at 80 • C until PAGBs were revealed, the solution was prepared with 100 mL of distilled water, 1.5 g of Sodium dodecyl sulphate as a surfactant and 5 to 7 drops of HCl. The average grain size and recrystallisation fraction were estimated for each deformation condition using at least 3 OM images, the average grain size was obtained with the linear intercept method (ASTM E-112) whereas the recrystallised fraction was determined with the point counting method.…”
Section: Metallographic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis was conducted in the FEI Inspect F50 microscope using a voltage of 20 kV and a step size of 0.1 µm. For the observation of the prior austenite grain boundaries (PAGBs), polished samples prepared following on from other published research [25][26][27], and were etched between 1 and 3 min in a saturated aqueous picric acid solution at 80 • C until PAGBs were revealed, the solution was prepared with 100 mL of distilled water, 1.5 g of Sodium dodecyl sulphate as a surfactant and 5 to 7 drops of HCl. The average grain size and recrystallisation fraction were estimated for each deformation condition using at least 3 OM images, the average grain size was obtained with the linear intercept method (ASTM E-112) whereas the recrystallised fraction was determined with the point counting method.…”
Section: Metallographic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%